Evidence map›Paper›PMID 22771454›Full record

ReviewProgress in retinal and eye research2012

Cell replacement and visual restoration by retinal sheet transplants.

Magdalene J Seiler, Robert B Aramant

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Progress in retinal and eye research, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 85 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
85citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

85 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Animal models for the evaluation of retinal stem cell therapies.Progress in retinal and eye research · 2025
    Review
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Review
  20. Retinal Organoids and Retinal Prostheses: An Overview.International journal of molecular sciences · 2022
    Review

25 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Magdalene J SeilerDepartment of Anatomy & Neurobiology, Reeve-Irvine Research Center, Sue & Bill Gross Stem Cell Research Center, University of California at Irvine, 1101 Gross Hall, 845 Health Science Rd., Irvine, CA 92697-4265, USA. mseiler@uci.edu
Robert B Aramant

Funding

USC/NORRIS COMPREHENSIVE CANCER CENTER (CORE) SUPPORTP30CA014089 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA · PI Fumito Ito · 1985 to 2026
$181.4M
VISION RESEARCHP30EY003040 · NEI · DOHENY EYE INSTITUTE · PI SUN, DEMING · 1985 to 2013
$7.0M
Retina Implantation Instrument KitR44EY015584 · NEI · OCULAR TRANSPLANTATION, LLC · PI ARAMANT, ROBERT B · 2006 to 2007
$684k
Disposable Instrument for Broader Patient Access to Vision Restoration TherapyR43EY020787 · NEI · OCULAR TRANSPLANTATION, LLC · PI ARAMANT, ROBERT B · 2010 to 2010
$222k
Retina Implantation Instrument KitR43EY015584 · NEI · OCULAR TRANSPLANTATION, LLC · PI ARAMANT, ROBERT B · 2004 to 2004
$108k
TRANSPLANTATION OF RETINA TO RETINAR01EY008519 · NEI · UNIVERSITY OF LOUISVILLE · PI ARAMANT, ROBERT B · 1991 to 1998
–
NCI NIH HHS P30 CA014089NEI NIH HHS 1R43EY020787NEI NIH HHS EY03040NEI NIH HHS EY054375NEI NIH HHS EY08519NEI NIH HHS P30 EY003040NEI NIH HHS R43 EY015584NEI NIH HHS R43 EY020787NEI NIH HHS R44 EY015584
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Retinal diseases such as age-related macular degeneration (ARMD) and retinitis pigmentosa (RP) affect millions of people. Replacing lost cells with new cells that connect with the still functional part of the host retina might repair a degenerating retina and restore eyesight to an unknown extent. A unique model, subretinal transplantation of freshly dissected sheets of fetal-derived retinal progenitor cells, combined with its retinal pigment epithelium (RPE), has demonstrated successful results in both animals and humans. Most other approaches are restricted to rescue endogenous retinal cells of the recipient in earlier disease stages by a 'nursing' role of the implanted cells and are not aimed at neural retinal cell replacement. Sheet transplants restore lost visual responses in several retinal degeneration models in the superior colliculus (SC) corresponding to the location of the transplant in the retina. They do not simply preserve visual performance - they increase visual responsiveness to light. Restoration of visual responses in the SC can be directly traced to neural cells in the transplant, demonstrating that synaptic connections between transplant and host contribute to the visual improvement. Transplant processes invade the inner plexiform layer of the host retina and form synapses with presumable host cells. In a Phase II trial of RP and ARMD patients, transplants of retina together with its RPE improved visual acuity. In summary, retinal progenitor sheet transplantation provides an excellent model to answer questions about how to repair and restore function of a degenerating retina. Supply of fetal donor tissue will always be limited but the model can set a standard and provide an informative base for optimal cell replacement therapies such as embryonic stem cell (ESC)-derived therapy.

Indexed as

Vision, OcularAnimalsFetal Tissue TransplantationHumansRetinaRetinal DegenerationRetinitis PigmentosaStem Cell Transplantation

Identifiers

PMID22771454
PMCPMC3472113

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.