Evidence map›Paper›PMID 22770689›Full record

ArticleMagnetic resonance imaging2012

Development and characterization of rodent cardiac phantoms: comparison with in vivo cardiac imaging.

Steven Fortune, Maurits A Jansen, Tom Anderson, Gillian A Gray, Jürgen E Schneider, Peter R Hoskins, Ian Marshall

Abstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in Magnetic resonance imaging, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. In-silico heart model phantom to validate cardiac strain imaging.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2024
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Quantitative Validation of MRI-Based Motion Estimation for Brain Impact Biomechanics.Computational biomechanics for medicine. Personalisation, validation and therapy · 2020
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Steven FortuneMedical Physics and Medical Engineering, University of Edinburgh. steven.fortune@gmail.com
Maurits A Jansen
Tom Anderson
Gillian A Gray
Jürgen E Schneider
Peter R Hoskins
Ian Marshall

Funding

British Heart Foundation FS/11/50/29038Medical Research Council G0700695Wellcome Trust 090532
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The increasing availability of rodent models of human cardiovascular disease has led to a need to translate noninvasive imaging techniques such as magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) from the clinic to the animal laboratory. The aim of this study was to develop phantoms simulating the short-axis view of left ventricular motion of rats and mice, thus reducing the need for live animals in the development of MRI. Cylindrical phantoms were moulded from polyvinyl alcohol (PVA) Cryogel and attached via stiff water-filled tubing to a gear pump. Pulsatile distension of the phantoms was effected by suitable programming of the pump. Cine MRI scanning was carried out at 7 T and compared with in vivo rodent cardiac imaging. Suitable pulsatile performance was achieved with phantoms for which the PVA material had been subjected to two freeze-thaw cycles, resulting in T1 and T2 relaxation time constants of 1656±124 ms and 55±10 ms, respectively. For the rat phantom operating at 240 beats per min (bpm), the dynamic range of the outer diameter was from 10.3 to 12.4 mm with the wall thickness varying between 1.9 and 1.2 mm. Corresponding figures for the mouse phantom at 480 bpm were outer diameter range from 5.4 to 6.4 mm and wall thickness from 1.5 to 1.2 mm. Dynamic cardiac phantoms simulating rodent left ventricular motion in the short-axis view were successfully developed and compared with in vivo imaging. The phantoms can be used for future development work with reduced need of live animals.

Indexed as

Models, AnimalAnimalsEquipment DesignEquipment Failure AnalysisHeartMagnetic Resonance ImagingMicePhantoms, ImagingRatsReproducibility of ResultsSensitivity and Specificity

Identifiers

PMID22770689
PMCPMC3471072

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.