Evidence map›Paper›PMID 22770436›Full record

Trial reportBMC medical research methodology2012

Simultaneous evaluation of abstinence and relapse using a Markov chain model in smokers enrolled in a two-year randomized trial.

Hung-Wen Yeh, Edward F Ellerbeck, Jonathan D Mahnken

Abstract readComparative StudyRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in BMC medical research methodology, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Improving Prediction of Tobacco Use Over Time: Findings from Waves 1-4 of the Population Assessment of Tobacco and Health Study.Nicotine & tobacco research : official journal of the Society for Research on Nicotine and Tobacco · 2024
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Motivational interviewing for smoking cessation.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2019
    Review
  7. Observational
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. The predictive value of smoking expectancy and the heritability of its accuracy.Nicotine & tobacco research : official journal of the Society for Research on Nicotine and Tobacco · 2014
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Hung-Wen YehDepartment of Biostatistics, The University of Kansas Medical Center, Kansas City, KS 66160, USA. hyeh@kumc.edu
Edward F Ellerbeck
Jonathan D Mahnken

Funding

Heartland Institute for Clinical and Translational ResearchUL1TR000001 · NCATS · UNIVERSITY OF KANSAS MEDICAL CENTER · PI BAROHN, RICHARD J. · 2012 to 2015
$13.0M
Disease Management for Smokers in Rural Primary CareR01CA101963 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF KANSAS MEDICAL CENTER · PI ELLERBECK, EDWARD F. · 2003 to 2013
$6.3M
HEARTLAND INSTITUTE FOR CLINICAL AND TRANSLATIONAL RESEARCHUL1RR033179 · NCRR · UNIVERSITY OF KANSAS MEDICAL CENTER · PI BAROHN, RICHARD J. · 2011 to 2011
$3.2M
NCATS NIH HHS UL1TR000001NCI NIH HHS R01 CA101963NCI NIH HHS R01CA101963NCRR NIH HHS UL1 RR033179NCRR NIH HHS UL1RR033179
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundGEE and mixed models are powerful tools to compare treatment effects in longitudinal smoking cessation trials. However, they are not capable of assessing the relapse (from abstinent back to smoking) simultaneously with cessation, which can be studied by transition models.

methodsWe apply a first-order Markov chain model to analyze the transition of smoking status measured every 6 months in a 2-year randomized smoking cessation trial, and to identify what factors are associated with the transition from smoking to abstinent and from abstinent to smoking. Missing values due to non-response are assumed non-ignorable and handled by the selection modeling approach.

resultsSmokers receiving high-intensity disease management (HDM), of male gender, lower daily cigarette consumption, higher motivation and confidence to quit, and having serious attempts to quit were more likely to become abstinent (OR = 1.48, 1.66, 1.03, 1.15, 1.09 and 1.34, respectively) in the next 6 months. Among those who were abstinent, lower income and stronger nicotine dependence (OR = 1.72 for ≤ vs. > 40 K and OR = 1.75 for first cigarette ≤ vs. > 5 min) were more likely to have relapse in the next 6 months.

conclusionsMarkov chain models allow investigation of dynamic smoking-abstinence behavior and suggest that relapse is influenced by different factors than cessation. The knowledge of treatments and covariates in transitions in both directions may provide guidance for designing more effective interventions on smoking cessation and relapse prevention.

Indexed as

Markov ChainsMotivationSmoking PreventionAdultCombined Modality TherapyCounselingDisease ManagementHumansLogistic ModelsLongitudinal StudiesMaleMiddle AgedRural PopulationSecondary PreventionSelf EfficacySex Distribution

Identifiers

PMID22770436
PMCPMC3599722

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.