ArticleBMC health services research2012
Factors affecting collaboration between general practitioners and community pharmacists: a qualitative study.
Article in BMC health services research, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 31 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
31 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 61 citations in OpenAlex.
- Developing a quality framework for community pharmacy: a systematic review of international literature.BMJ open · 2024Pooled it
- Pooled it
- Implementation of a patient-centred complex intervention to improve Initial Medication Adherence to cardiovascular disease and diabetes treatments in primary care (the IMA-cRCT study): a mixed-methods process evaluation.BMJ quality & safety · 2026Trial
- Prescriber Implementation of STOPP/START Recommendations for Hospitalised Older Adults: A Comparison of a Pharmacist Approach and a Physician Approach.Drugs & aging · 2019Trial
- Reasons and Outcomes of Pharmacy-Initiated Communication with Medical Practices-A Flashmob Study in Germany.Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Good Practices and Challenges in the Collaboration of Pharmacists with General Practitioners-A Scoping Review.Pharmacy (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
- Understanding collaborative working between GPs and community pharmacists: systematic review and thematic synthesis of qualitative studies.BJGP open · 2025Article
- Collaborative and integrated working between general practice and community pharmacies: A realist review of what works, for whom, and in which contexts.Journal of health services research & policy · 2025Review
- Article
- Community pharmacists' perspectives towards automated pharmacy systems and extended community pharmacy services: An online cross-sectional study.Exploratory research in clinical and social pharmacy · 2023Article
- Factors Influencing the Implementation of Interprofessional Collaborative Practice in Teaching Hospital Setting: A Mixed-Method Study.Journal of advances in medical education & professionalism · 2023Article
- GPs' and pharmacists' views of integrating pharmacists into general practices: a qualitative study.The British journal of general practice : the journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners · 2023Article
- Family physicians collaborating for health system integration: a scoping review.BMC health services research · 2023Article
- Article
- Barriers to Medication Review Process Implementation-Cross-Sectional Study among Community Pharmacists in Jordan.Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022Article
- Factors influencing the degree of physician-pharmacists collaboration within governmental hospitals of Jigjiga Town, Somali National Regional State, Ethiopia, 2020.BMC health services research · 2021Article
- General Practitioners and Community Pharmacists' Collaboration in Primary Care: Small Steps for a Major Change.International journal of integrated care · 2021Article
- Article
- Perspectives of practising pharmacists towards interprofessional education and collaborative practice in Qatar.International journal of clinical pharmacy · 2018Article
- Community pharmacists' views of using a screening tool to structure medicines use reviews for older people: findings from qualitative interviews.International journal of clinical pharmacy · 2018Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors at 3 institutions in 3 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundAlthough general practitioners (GPs) and community pharmacists (CPs) are encouraged to collaborate, a true collaborative relationship does not exist between them. Our objective was to identify and analyze factors affecting GP-CP collaboration.
methodsThis was a descriptive-exploratory qualitative study carried out in two Spanish regions: Catalonia (Barcelona) and Balearic Islands (Mallorca). Face-to-face semi-structured interviews were conducted with GPs and CPs from Barcelona and Mallorca (January 2010-February 2011). Analysis was conducted using Colaizzi's method.
resultsThirty-seven interviews were conducted. The factors affecting the relationship were different depending on timing: 1) Before collaboration had started (prior to collaboration) and 2) Once the collaboration had been initiated (during collaboration). Prior to collaboration, four key factors were found to affect it: the perception of usefulness; the Primary Care Health Center (PCHC) manager's interest; the professionals' attitude; and geography and legislation. These factors were affected by economic and organizational aspects (i.e. resources or PCHC management styles) and by professionals' opinions and beliefs (i.e. perception of the existence of a public-private conflict). During collaboration, the achievement of objectives and the changes in the PCHC management were the key factors influencing continued collaboration. The most relevant differences between regions were due to the existence of privately-managed PCHCs in Barcelona that facilitated the implementation of collaboration. In comparison with the group with experience in collaboration, some professionals without experience reported a skeptical attitude towards it, reporting that it might not be necessary.
conclusionsFactors related to economic issues, management and practitioners' attitudes and perceptions might be crucial for triggering collaboration. Interventions and strategies derived from these identified factors could be applied to achieve multidisciplinary collaboration.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.