Evidence map›Paper›PMID 22769059›Full record

ArticleBMC complementary and alternative medicine2012

Using a Delphi consensus process to develop an acupuncture treatment protocol by consensus for women undergoing Assisted Reproductive Technology (ART) treatment.

Caroline A Smith, Suzanne Grant, Jane Lyttleton, Suzanne Cochrane

Registry-linked trialAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC complementary and alternative medicine, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT03981120 (The Effect of Acupuncture on in Vitro Fertilization Outcomes in Women Undergoing Euploid Embryo Transfer - A Pilot Study), which is not on this map. Cited by 17 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
17citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT03981120 naunknown statusnot on this mapstarted 2019, after this paper: background citation

The Effect of Acupuncture on in Vitro Fertilization Outcomes in Women Undergoing Euploid Embryo Transfer - A Pilot Study

TypeinterventionalSponsorUniversity of British ColumbiaRan2019 to 2020Enrolled100ConditionsInfertility, AneuploidyArmsLaser and Traditional Acupuncture
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

17 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Acupuncture intervention for acute pain in the Emergency Department trial: a consensus process.Acupuncture in medicine : journal of the British Medical Acupuncture Society · 2022
    Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. TCM Pattern Questionnaire for Lateral Elbow Pain: Development of an Instrument via a Delphi Process.Evidence-based complementary and alternative medicine : eCAM · 2016
    Article
  17. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Caroline A SmithCentre for Complementary Medicine Research, University of Western Sydney, Locked Bag 1797, Penrith South DC, NSW, 2751, Australia. caroline.smith@uws.edu.au
Suzanne Grant
Jane Lyttleton
Suzanne Cochrane

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundAssisted reproductive technologies (ART) are increasingly utilised for resolving difficulties conceiving. These technologies are expensive to both the public purse and the individual consumers. Acupuncture is widely used as an adjunct to ART with indications that it may assist reducing the time to conception and increasing live birth rates. Heterogeneity is high between treatment protocols. The aim of this study was to examine what fertility acupuncturists consider key components of best practice acupuncture during an ART cycle, and to establish an acupuncture protocol by consensus.

methodsFifteen international acupuncturists with extensive experience treating women during ART interventions participated in 3 rounds of Delphi questionnaires. The first round focused on identifying the parameters of acupuncture treatment as adjunct to ART, the second round evaluated statements derived from the earlier round, and the third evaluated specific parameters for a proposed trial protocol. Consensus was defined as greater than 80% agreement.

resultsSignificant agreement was achieved on the parameters of best practice acupuncture, including an acupuncture protocol suitable for future research. Study participants confirmed the importance of needling aspects relating to the dose of acupuncture, the therapeutic relationship, tailoring treatment to the individual, and the role of co-interventions. From two rounds of the Delphi a consensus was achieved on seven treatment parameters for the design of the acupuncture treatment to be used in a clinical trial of acupuncture as an adjunct to ART. The treatment protocol includes the use of the traditional Chinese medicine acupuncture, use of manual acupuncture, a first treatment administered between day 6-8 of the stimulated ART cycle which is individualised to the participant, two treatments will be administered on the day of embryo transfer, and will include points SP8, SP10, LR3, ST29, CV4, and post transfer include: GV20, KD3, ST36, SP6, and PC6. Auricular points Shenmen and Zigong will be used. Practitioner intent or yi will be addressed in the treatment protocol.

conclusionsDespite a lack of homogeneity in the research and clinical literature on ART and acupuncture, a consensus amongst experts on key components of a best practice treatment protocol was possible. Such consensus offers guidance for further research.

Indexed as

Acupuncture PointsClinical ProtocolsConsensusPractice Guidelines as TopicReproductive Techniques, AssistedAcupuncture TherapyAdultAgedDelphi TechniqueEmbryo TransferFemaleHumansInfertilityIntentionMaleMiddle Aged

Identifiers

PMID22769059
PMCPMC3416745

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.