Evidence map›Paper›PMID 22768296›Full record

ArticlePloS one2012

Dual hypocretin receptor antagonism is more effective for sleep promotion than antagonism of either receptor alone.

Stephen R Morairty, Florent G Revel, Pari Malherbe, Jean-Luc Moreau, Daniel Valladao, Joseph G Wettstein, Thomas S Kilduff, Edilio Borroni

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 57 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
57citing papers in PubMed
7.7field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

57 citing papers in PubMed, 121 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. At the intersection of sleep deficiency and opioid use: mechanisms and therapeutic opportunities.Translational research : the journal of laboratory and clinical medicine · 2021
    Review
  11. Article
  12. Circadian rhythm as a therapeutic target.Nature reviews. Drug discovery · 2021
    Review
  13. Hypocretin/Orexin Receptor Pharmacology and Sleep Phases.Frontiers of neurology and neuroscience · 2021
    Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Stephen R MorairtyCenter for Neuroscience and Metabolic Disease Research, SRI International, Menlo Park, California, USA. stephen.morairty@sri.com
Florent G Revel
Pari Malherbe
Jean-Luc Moreau
Daniel Valladao
Joseph G Wettstein
Thomas S Kilduff
Edilio Borroni
Roche (Switzerland) · CHSRI International · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The hypocretin (orexin) system is involved in sleep/wake regulation, and antagonists of both hypocretin receptor type 1 (HCRTR1) and/or HCRTR2 are considered to be potential hypnotic medications. It is currently unclear whether blockade of either or both receptors is more effective for promoting sleep with minimal side effects. Accordingly, we compared the properties of selective HCRTR1 (SB-408124 and SB-334867) and HCRTR2 (EMPA) antagonists with that of the dual HCRTR1/R2 antagonist almorexant in the rat. All 4 antagonists bound to their respective receptors with high affinity and selectivity in vitro. Since in vivo pharmacokinetic experiments revealed poor brain penetration for SB-408124, SB-334867 was selected for subsequent in vivo studies. When injected in the mid-active phase, SB-334867 produced small increases in rapid-eye-movement (REM) and non-REM (NR) sleep. EMPA produced a significant increase in NR only at the highest dose studied. In contrast, almorexant decreased NR latency and increased both NR and REM proportionally throughout the subsequent 6 h without rebound wakefulness. The increased NR was due to a greater number of NR bouts; NR bout duration was unchanged. At the highest dose tested (100 mg/kg), almorexant fragmented sleep architecture by increasing the number of waking and REM bouts. No evidence of cataplexy was observed. HCRTR1 occupancy by almorexant declined 4-6 h post-administration while HCRTR2 occupancy was still elevated after 12 h, revealing a complex relationship between occupancy of HCRT receptors and sleep promotion. We conclude that dual HCRTR1/R2 blockade is more effective in promoting sleep than blockade of either HCRTR alone. In contrast to GABA receptor agonists which induce sleep by generalized inhibition, HCRTR antagonists seem to facilitate sleep by reducing waking "drive".

Indexed as

AminopyridinesAnimalsBenzoxazolesDose-Response Relationship, DrugGABA AgonistsMaleNaphthyridinesOrexin ReceptorsPhenylurea CompoundsRats, Sprague-DawleyReceptors, G-Protein-CoupledReceptors, NeuropeptideSleepSulfonamidesUrea1-(2-methylbenzoxazol-6-yl)-3-(1,5)naphthyridin-4-yl ureaAminopyridinesBenzoxazolesGABA AgonistsHcrtr2 protein, ratNaphthyridinesN-ethyl-2-((6-methoxy-pyridin-3-yl)-(toluene-2-sulphonyl)amino)-N-pyridin-3-ylmethyl-acetamideOrexin ReceptorsPhenylurea CompoundsReceptors, G-Protein-CoupledReceptors, NeuropeptideSB 408124SulfonamidesUrea

Identifiers

PMID22768296
PMCPMC3388080
OpenAlexW2068471533

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.