Evidence map›Paper›PMID 22768293›Full record

SynthesisPloS one2012

Association between XPF polymorphisms and cancer risk: a meta-analysis.

Ting-Yan Shi, Jing He, Li-Xin Qiu, Mei-Ling Zhu, Meng-Yun Wang, Xiao-Yan Zhou, Jiali Han, Hongpin Yu, Rong-Yu Zang, Qingyi Wei

Abstract readMeta-AnalysisReview
In one paragraph

Synthesis in PloS one, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 23 papers, 7 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
23citing papers in PubMed, 7 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

23 citing papers in PubMed, 7 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Pooled it
  6. Current evidences on IL1B polymorphisms and lung cancer susceptibility: a meta-analysis.Tumour biology : the journal of the International Society for Oncodevelopmental Biology and Medicine · 2013
    Pooled it
  7. Pooled it
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. TheHeliyon · 2021
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Polymorphisms in DNA repair genes in gastrointestinal stromal tumours: susceptibility and correlation with tumour characteristics and clinical outcome.Tumour biology : the journal of the International Society for Oncodevelopmental Biology and Medicine · 2016
    Article
  16. Article
  17. XPC (A2920C), XPF (T30028C), TP53 (Arg72Pro), and GSTP1 (Ile105Val) polymorphisms in prognosis of cutaneous melanoma.Tumour biology : the journal of the International Society for Oncodevelopmental Biology and Medicine · 2016
    Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Ting-Yan ShiCancer Research Laboratory, Fudan University Shanghai Cancer Center, Shanghai, China.
Jing He
Li-Xin Qiu
Mei-Ling Zhu
Meng-Yun Wang
Xiao-Yan Zhou
Jiali Han
Hongpin Yu
Rong-Yu Zang
Qingyi Wei

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundXeroderma pigmentosum complementation group F (XPF or ERCC4) plays a key role in DNA repair that protects against genetic instability and carcinogenesis. A series of epidemiological studies have examined associations between XPF polymorphisms and cancer risk, but the findings remain inconclusive. METHODOLOGY/PRINCIPAL

findingsIn this meta-analysis of 47,639 cancer cases and 51,915 controls, by searching three electronic databases (i.e., MEDLINE, EMBASE and CNKI), we summarized 43 case-control studies from 29 publications on four commonly studied polymorphisms of XPF (i.e., rs1800067, rs1799801, rs2020955 and rs744154), and we did not find statistical evidence of any significant association with overall cancer risk. However, in stratification analyses, we found a significant association of XPF-rs1799801 with a reduced cancer risk in Caucasian populations (4,845 cases and 5,556 controls; recessive model: OR=0.87, 95% CI=0.76-1.00, P=0.049, P=0.723 for heterogeneity test, I(2) =0). Further genotype-phenotype correlation analysis showed that the homozygous variant CC genotype carriers had higher XPF expression levels than that of the TT genotype carriers (Student's t test for a recessive model: P=0.046). No publication bias was found by using the funnel plot and Egger's test.

conclusionThis meta-analysis suggests a lack of statistical evidence for the association between the four XPF SNPs and overall risk of cancers. However, XPF-rs1799801 may be associated with cancer risk in Caucasian populations, which needs to be further validated in single large, well-designed prospective studies.

Indexed as

GenotypePolymorphism, Single NucleotideCase-Control StudiesDNA-Binding ProteinsFemaleGene Expression Regulation, NeoplasticHumansMaleNeoplasm ProteinsNeoplasmsRisk FactorsWhite PeopleDNA-Binding ProteinsNeoplasm Proteinsxeroderma pigmentosum group F protein

Identifiers

PMID22768293
PMCPMC3388076

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.