Evidence map›Paper›PMID 22768270›Full record

ArticlePloS one2012

Use of mutagenesis, genetic mapping and next generation transcriptomics to investigate insecticide resistance mechanisms.

Predrag Kalajdzic, Stefan Oehler, Martin Reczko, Nena Pavlidi, John Vontas, Artemis G Hatzigeorgiou, Charalambos Savakis

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. The Power ofFrontiers in physiology · 2021
    Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Effects of neonicotinoids and fipronil on non-target invertebrates.Environmental science and pollution research international · 2015
    Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Predrag KalajdzicInstitute for Biological Research, University of Belgrade, Belgrade, Serbia. pedja@ibiss.bg.ac.rs
Stefan Oehler
Martin Reczko
Nena Pavlidi
John Vontas
Artemis G Hatzigeorgiou
Charalambos Savakis

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Insecticide resistance is a worldwide problem with major impact on agriculture and human health. Understanding the underlying molecular mechanisms is crucial for the management of the phenomenon; however, this information often comes late with respect to the implementation of efficient counter-measures, particularly in the case of metabolism-based resistance mechanisms. We employed a genome-wide insertional mutagenesis screen to Drosophila melanogaster, using a Minos-based construct, and retrieved a line (MiT[w(-)]3R2) resistant to the neonicotinoid insecticide Imidacloprid. Biochemical and bioassay data indicated that resistance was due to increased P450 detoxification. Deep sequencing transcriptomic analysis revealed substantial over- and under-representation of 357 transcripts in the resistant line, including statistically significant changes in mixed function oxidases, peptidases and cuticular proteins. Three P450 genes (Cyp4p2, Cyp6a2 and Cyp6g1) located on the 2R chromosome, are highly up-regulated in mutant flies compared to susceptible Drosophila. One of them (Cyp6g1) has been already described as a major factor for Imidacloprid resistance, which validated the approach. Elevated expression of the Cyp4p2 was not previously documented in Drosophila lines resistant to neonicotinoids. In silico analysis using the Drosophila reference genome failed to detect transcription binding factors or microRNAs associated with the over-expressed Cyp genes. The resistant line did not contain a Minos insertion in its chromosomes, suggesting a hit-and-run event, i.e. an insertion of the transposable element, followed by an excision which caused the mutation. Genetic mapping placed the resistance locus to the right arm of the second chromosome, within a ∼1 Mb region, where the highly up-regulated Cyp6g1 gene is located. The nature of the unknown mutation that causes resistance is discussed on the basis of these results.

Indexed as

AnimalsBiological AssayChromosome MappingChromosomes, InsectComputational BiologyDDTDown-RegulationDrosophila melanogasterFemaleGene Expression ProfilingGenes, InsectGenetic LociHigh-Throughput Nucleotide SequencingHumansImidazolesInactivation, MetabolicDDTimidaclopridImidazolesNeonicotinoidsNitro Compounds

Identifiers

PMID22768270
PMCPMC3386967

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.