Evidence map›Paper›PMID 22767400›Full record

ArticleZeitschrift fur Gerontologie und Geriatrie2012

Tools in polypharmacy. Current evidence from observational and controlled studies.

P Dovjak

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Zeitschrift fur Gerontologie und Geriatrie, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Innovating medication reviews through a technology-enabled process.Research in social & administrative pharmacy : RSAP · 2022
    Article
  4. Polypharmacy in elderly people.Wiener medizinische Wochenschrift (1946) · 2022
    Review
  5. Article
  6. Sarcopenia in cases of chronic and acute illness. A mini-review.Zeitschrift fur Gerontologie und Geriatrie · 2016
    Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Polypharmacy among the Elderly.Journal of mid-life health
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

P DovjakLandeskrankenhaus Gmunden, Miller von Aichholzstr. 49, 4810, Gmunden, Austria. peter.dovjak@gespag.at

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Increasing evidence in managing polypharmacy in the growing elderly population with a higher prevalence of multiple chronic disease is the basis for this paper. Poor adherence, drug-drug interactions, drug-disease interactions, and inappropriate medication challenge the prescriptions of health care providers in this group of patients. Risk factors, the prevalence of polypharmacy, and the impact on health issues will be shown by analyzing the recent literature. Based on intervention trials, several tools in polypharmacy have emerged as practical guides for clinical practice or for the geriatric ward to solve this problem. The Medication Appropriateness Index (MAI) and national lists of potentially inappropriate medication used in clinical practice are presented, including Screening Tool to Alert Doctors to the Right Treatment (START), Screening Tool of Older Persons' Potentially Inappropriate Prescriptions (STOPP), and Assess, Comprehensive Geriatric Assessment, Adherence, Development, Emergence, Minimization, Interdisciplinarity, Alertness (ACADEMIA).

Indexed as

AlgorithmsDrug InteractionsEvidence-Based MedicinePolypharmacyAgedAged, 80 and overControlled Clinical Trials as TopicDrug-Related Side Effects and Adverse ReactionsFemaleHumansInappropriate PrescribingIncidenceMaleRisk AssessmentRisk Factors

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.