ArticleJournal of molecular medicine (Berlin, Germany)2012
Rapid identification of novel functional promoters for gene therapy.
Article in Journal of molecular medicine (Berlin, Germany), 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Non-Coding RNA in Systemic Sclerosis: A Valuable Tool for Translational and Personalized Medicine.Genes · 2021Review
- Progresses towards safe and efficient gene therapy vectors.Oncotarget · 2015Review
- A promoter-level mammalian expression atlas.Nature · 2014Article
- Gene delivery potential of biofunctional carbonate apatite nanoparticles in lungs.BioMed research international · 2014Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Transcriptional control of transgene expression is crucial to successful gene therapy, yet few promoter/enhancer combinations have been tested in clinical trials. We created a simple, desktop computer database and populated it with promoter sequences from publicly available sources. From this database, we rapidly identified novel CpG-free promoter sequences suitable for use in non-inflammatory, non-viral in vivo gene transfer. In a simple model of lung gene transfer, five of the six promoter elements selected, chosen without prior knowledge of their transcriptional activities, directed significant transgene expression. Each of the five novel promoters directed transgene expression for at least 14 days post-delivery, greatly exceeding the duration achieved with the commonly used CpG-rich viral enhancer/promoters. Novel promoter activity was also evaluated in a more clinically relevant model of aerosol-mediated lung gene transfer and in the liver following delivery via high-pressure tail vein injection. In each case, the novel CpG-free promoters exhibited higher and/or more sustained transgene expression than commonly used CpG-rich enhancer/promoter sequences. This study demonstrates that novel CpG-free promoters can be readily identified and that they can direct significant levels of transgene expression. Furthermore, the database search criteria can be quickly adjusted to identify other novel promoter elements for a variety of transgene expression applications.
Indexed as
Identifiers
22767241What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.