Evidence map›Paper›PMID 22767146›Full record

Trial reportBritish journal of cancer2012

Sorafenib in advanced melanoma: a critical role for pharmacokinetics?

N Pécuchet, C Lebbe, O Mir, B Billemont, B Blanchet, N Franck, M Viguier, R Coriat, M Tod, M-F Avril and 1 more

Registry-linked trialOpen access · hybridAbstract readClinical Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in British journal of cancer, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT02636426 (Sorafenib Administered Using a High-dose, Pulsatile Regimen in Patients With Advanced Solid Malignancies), which is not on this map. Cited by 21 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
21citing papers in PubMed
2.3field-weighted citation impact, top 11% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT02636426 phase1completednot on this mapstarted 2015, after this paper: background citation

Sorafenib Administered Using a High-dose, Pulsatile Regimen in Patients With Advanced Solid Malignancies: a Phase I Exposure Escalation Study

TypeinterventionalSponsorAmsterdam UMC, location VUmcRan2015 to 2017Enrolled17ConditionsNeoplasmsArmssorafenib
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

21 citing papers in PubMed, 49 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Clinical development of targeted and immune based anti-cancer therapies.Journal of experimental & clinical cancer research : CR · 2019
    Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Alternative scheduling of pulsatile, high dose sunitinib efficiently suppresses tumor growth.Journal of experimental & clinical cancer research : CR · 2016
    Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Emerging targeted therapies for melanoma treatment (review).International journal of oncology · 2014
    Review
  19. Article
  20. Observational
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 6 institutions in 1 country.

N PécuchetDepartment of Medical Oncology, Centre for Research on Angiogenesis Inhibitors (CERIA), Cochin Teaching Hospital, Université Paris Descartes, Sorbonne Paris Cité, AP-HP, 27, rue du faubourg Saint Jacques, F75014 Paris, France.
C Lebbe
O Mir
B Billemont
B Blanchet
N Franck
M Viguier
R Coriat
M Tod
M-F Avril
F Goldwasser
Université Paris Cité · FRAssistance Publique – Hôpitaux de Paris · FRDélégation Paris 5 · FRHospices Civils de Lyon · FRInserm · FRSorbonne Paris Cité · FR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundInter-patient pharmacokinetic variability can lead to suboptimal drug exposure, and therefore might impact the efficacy of sorafenib. This study reports long-term pharmacokinetic monitoring of patients treated with sorafenib and a retrospective pharmacodynamic/pharmacokinetic analysis in melanoma patients. PATIENTS AND

methodsHeavily pretreated patients with stage IV melanoma were started on sorafenib 400 mg twice daily (bid). In the absence of limiting toxicity, dose escalation of 200 mg bid levels was done every 2 weeks. Plasma sorafenib measurement was performed at each visit, allowing a retrospective pharmacodynamic/pharmacokinetic analysis for safety and efficacy.

resultsIn all, 19 of 30 patients underwent dose escalation over 400 mg bid, and 28 were evaluable for response. The overall disease control rate was 61% (95% confidence interval (CI): 42.6-78.8), including three confirmed responses (12%). Disease control rate and progression-free survival (PFS) were improved in patients with high vs low exposure (80% vs 32%, P=0.02, and 5.25 vs 2.5 months, P=0.005, hazard ratio (HR)=0.28 (95% CI: 0.11-0.73)). In contrast, drug dosing had no effect on PFS. In multivariate analysis, drug exposure was the only factor associated with PFS (HR=0.36 (95% CI: 0.13-0.99)). Diarrhoea and anorexia were correlated with drug dosing, while hypertension and hand-foot skin reaction were correlated with drug exposure.

conclusionsAlthough sorafenib had modest efficacy in melanoma, these results suggest a correlation between exposure and efficacy of sorafenib. Therefore, dose optimisation in patients with low exposure at standard doses should be evaluated in validated indications.

Indexed as

AdultAgedAged, 80 and overAntineoplastic AgentsBenzenesulfonatesDisease-Free SurvivalFemaleHumansMaleMelanomaMiddle AgedMultivariate AnalysisNiacinamidePhenylurea CompoundsPyridinesRetrospective StudiesAntineoplastic AgentsBenzenesulfonatesNiacinamidePhenylurea CompoundsPyridinesSorafenib

Identifiers

PMID22767146
PMCPMC3405224
OpenAlexW2053599004

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-SA
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.