Evidence map›Paper›PMID 22765931›Full record

ArticlePreventing chronic disease2012

Estimating benefits of past, current, and future reductions in smoking rates using a comprehensive model with competing causes of death.

Jeroen van Meijgaard, Jonathan E Fielding

Open access · diamondAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Preventing chronic disease, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed
1.7field-weighted citation impact, top 16% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed, 21 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Tobacco Cessation Treatment Pathways for Patients With Cancer: 10 Years in the Making.Journal of the National Comprehensive Cancer Network : JNCCN · 2016
    Review
  9. Microsimulation Modeling of Coronary Heart Disease: Maximizing the Impact of Nonprofit Hospital-Based Interventions.Inquiry : a journal of medical care organization, provision and financing · 2016
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Medications for substance use disorders.Social work in public health · 2013
    Review
  12. Tobacco use patterns.Journal of environmental and public health · 2012
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Jeroen van MeijgaardDepartment of Health Services, University of California, Los Angeles School of Public Health, Los Angeles, CA 90095-1772, USA. jeroenvm@ucla.edu
Jonathan E Fielding
University of California, Los Angeles · US

Funding

UCLA/RAND HEALTH SERVICES RESEARCH TRAINING PROGRAMT32HS000046 · AHRQ · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA LOS ANGELES · PI EISENBERG, DANIEL · 1992 to 2024
$8.7M
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionDespite years of declining smoking prevalence, tobacco use is still the leading preventable contributor to illness and death in the United States, and the effect of past tobacco-use control efforts has not fully translated into improvements in health outcomes. The objective of this study was to use a life course model with multiple competing causes of death to elucidate the ongoing benefits of tobacco-use control efforts on US death rates.

methodsWe used a continuous-time life course simulation model for the US population. We modeled smoking initiation and cessation and 20 leading causes of death as competing risks over the life span, with the risk of death for each cause dependent on past and current smoking status. Risk parameters were estimated using data from the National Health Interview Survey that were linked to follow-up mortality data.

resultsUp to 14% (9% for men, 14% for women) of the total gain in life expectancy since 1960 was due to tobacco-use control efforts. Past efforts are expected to further increase life expectancy by 0.9 years for women and 1.3 years for men. Additional reduction in smoking prevalence may eventually yield an average 3.4-year increase in life expectancy in the United States. Coronary heart disease is expected to increase as a share of total deaths.

conclusionA dynamic individual-level model with multiple causes of death supports assessment of the delayed benefits of improved tobacco-use control efforts. We show that past smoking reduction efforts will translate into further increases in life expectancy in the coming years. Smoking will remain a major contributor to preventable illness and death, worthy of continued interventions.

Indexed as

Smoking PreventionAdolescentAdultAge of OnsetAlcohol DrinkingBody Mass IndexCapacity BuildingCause of DeathChronic DiseaseCost-Benefit AnalysisCross-Sectional StudiesExerciseFemaleHealth SurveysHumansLife Expectancy

Identifiers

PMID22765931
PMCPMC3468309
OpenAlexW2102088339

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.