ArticlePreventing chronic disease2012
Estimating benefits of past, current, and future reductions in smoking rates using a comprehensive model with competing causes of death.
Article in Preventing chronic disease, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
12 citing papers in PubMed, 21 citations in OpenAlex.
- Longitudinal assessment of smoking-related knowledge, attitude, and practice for cancer prevention: an analysis of data from the Korean National Cancer Prevention Awareness and Practice Survey.BMC public health · 2025Article
- Genetic architecture of four smoking behaviors using partitioned SNP heritability.Addiction (Abingdon, England) · 2021Article
- Spatial, temporal, and demographic patterns in prevalence of smoking tobacco use and attributable disease burden in 204 countries and territories, 1990-2019: a systematic analysis from the Global Burden of Disease Study 2019.Lancet (London, England) · 2021Article
- Socioeconomic inequalities in lung cancer - a time trend analysis with German health insurance data.BMC public health · 2021Article
- Compression, expansion, or maybe both? Growing inequalities in lung cancer in Germany.PloS one · 2020Article
- Slim cigarette smoking prevalence among Canadian youth smokers: Implications for federal standardized packaging legislation.Canadian journal of public health = Revue canadienne de sante publique · 2018Article
- Development and Pilot Randomized Control Trial of a Drama Program to Enhance Well-being Among Older Adults.The Arts in psychotherapy · 2017Article
- Tobacco Cessation Treatment Pathways for Patients With Cancer: 10 Years in the Making.Journal of the National Comprehensive Cancer Network : JNCCN · 2016Review
- Microsimulation Modeling of Coronary Heart Disease: Maximizing the Impact of Nonprofit Hospital-Based Interventions.Inquiry : a journal of medical care organization, provision and financing · 2016Article
- The longitudinal age and birth cohort trends of smoking in Sweden: a 24-year follow-up study.International journal of public health · 2014Article
- Medications for substance use disorders.Social work in public health · 2013Review
- Tobacco use patterns.Journal of environmental and public health · 2012Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
introductionDespite years of declining smoking prevalence, tobacco use is still the leading preventable contributor to illness and death in the United States, and the effect of past tobacco-use control efforts has not fully translated into improvements in health outcomes. The objective of this study was to use a life course model with multiple competing causes of death to elucidate the ongoing benefits of tobacco-use control efforts on US death rates.
methodsWe used a continuous-time life course simulation model for the US population. We modeled smoking initiation and cessation and 20 leading causes of death as competing risks over the life span, with the risk of death for each cause dependent on past and current smoking status. Risk parameters were estimated using data from the National Health Interview Survey that were linked to follow-up mortality data.
resultsUp to 14% (9% for men, 14% for women) of the total gain in life expectancy since 1960 was due to tobacco-use control efforts. Past efforts are expected to further increase life expectancy by 0.9 years for women and 1.3 years for men. Additional reduction in smoking prevalence may eventually yield an average 3.4-year increase in life expectancy in the United States. Coronary heart disease is expected to increase as a share of total deaths.
conclusionA dynamic individual-level model with multiple causes of death supports assessment of the delayed benefits of improved tobacco-use control efforts. We show that past smoking reduction efforts will translate into further increases in life expectancy in the coming years. Smoking will remain a major contributor to preventable illness and death, worthy of continued interventions.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.