Evidence map›Paper›PMID 22764239›Full record

ArticleThe Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience2012

Active engagement improves primary auditory cortical neurons' ability to discriminate temporal modulation.

Mamiko Niwa, Jeffrey S Johnson, Kevin N O'Connor, Mitchell L Sutter

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 71 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
71citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

71 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Neural Correlates of Perceptual Plasticity in the Auditory Midbrain and Thalamus.The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2025
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Adaptation in auditory processing.Physiological reviews · 2023
    Review

11 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Mamiko NiwaCenter for Neuroscience and Department of Neurobiology, Physiology, and Behavior, University of California, Davis, Davis, California 95618, USA.
Jeffrey S Johnson
Kevin N O'Connor
Mitchell L Sutter

Funding

Spectral and Temporal Integration in the Auditory SystemR01DC002514 · NIDCD · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA DAVIS · PI MITCHELL L SUTTER · 2001 to 2026
$10.3M
Functional spatial segregation in auditory scene analysisR01DC020514 · NIDCD · UNIVERSITY OF SOUTH FLORIDA · PI Erol James Ozmeral · 2023 to 2026
$1.9M
Single-unit response to AM sound in the auditory cortex.F31DC008935 · NIDCD · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA AT DAVIS · PI NIWA, MAMIKO · 2007 to 2009
$62k
NIDCD NIH HHS 5F31DC008935NIDCD NIH HHS DC-20514NIDCD NIH HHS F31 DC008935NIDCD NIH HHS R01 DC002514NIDCD NIH HHS R01 DC020514
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The effect of attention on single neuron responses in the auditory system is unresolved. We found that when monkeys discriminated temporally amplitude modulated (AM) from unmodulated sounds, primary auditory cortical (A1) neurons better discriminated those sounds than when the monkeys were not discriminating them. This was observed for both average firing rate and vector strength (VS), a measure of how well neurons temporally follow the stimulus' temporal modulation. When data were separated by nonsynchronized and synchronized responses, the firing rate of nonsynchronized responses best distinguished AM- noise from unmodulated noise, followed by VS for synchronized responses, with firing rate for synchronized neurons providing the poorest AM discrimination. Firing rate-based AM discrimination for synchronized neurons, however, improved most with task engagement, showing that the least sensitive code in the passive condition improves the most with task engagement. Rate coding improved due to larger increases in absolute firing rate at higher modulation depths than for lower depths and unmodulated sounds. Relative to spontaneous activity (which increased with engagement), the response to unmodulated sounds decreased substantially. The temporal coding improvement--responses more precisely temporally following a stimulus when animals were required to attend to it--expands the framework of possible mechanisms of attention to include increasing temporal precision of stimulus following. These findings provide a crucial step to understanding the coding of temporal modulation and support a model in which rate and temporal coding work in parallel, permitting a multiplexed code for temporal modulation, and for a complementary representation of rate and temporal coding.

Indexed as

Action PotentialsAnimalsAuditory CortexAuditory PerceptionDiscrimination, PsychologicalFemaleMacaca mulattaMaleNeuronsTime Perception

Identifiers

PMID22764239
PMCPMC3410753

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.