Evidence map›Paper›PMID 22764050›Full record

ArticleDevelopment (Cambridge, England)2012

Multiscale mechanisms of cell migration during development: theory and experiment.

Rebecca McLennan, Louise Dyson, Katherine W Prather, Jason A Morrison, Ruth E Baker, Philip K Maini, Paul M Kulesa

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Development (Cambridge, England), 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 59 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
59citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

59 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Self-generated chemotaxis of mixed cell populations.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2025
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Neural crest development: insights from the zebrafish.Developmental dynamics : an official publication of the American Association of Anatomists · 2020
    Review
  18. Article
  19. Embryonic Chicken (Comparative medicine · 2019
    Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Rebecca McLennanStowers Institute for Medical Research, 1000 East 50th St, Kansas City, MO 64110, USA.
Louise Dyson
Katherine W Prather
Jason A Morrison
Ruth E Baker
Philip K Maini
Paul M Kulesa

Funding

In Vivo Analysis of the Mechanisms of Neural Crest MigrationR01HD057922 · NICHD · STOWERS INSTITUTE FOR MEDICAL RESEARCH · PI KULESA, PAUL · 2008 to 2012
$1.7M
NICHD NIH HHS 1R01HD057922NICHD NIH HHS R01 HD057922
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Long-distance cell migration is an important feature of embryonic development, adult morphogenesis and cancer, yet the mechanisms that drive subpopulations of cells to distinct targets are poorly understood. Here, we use the embryonic neural crest (NC) in tandem with theoretical studies to evaluate model mechanisms of long-distance cell migration. We find that a simple chemotaxis model is insufficient to explain our experimental data. Instead, model simulations predict that NC cell migration requires leading cells to respond to long-range guidance signals and trailing cells to short-range cues in order to maintain a directed, multicellular stream. Experiments confirm differences in leading versus trailing NC cell subpopulations, manifested in unique cell orientation and gene expression patterns that respond to non-linear tissue growth of the migratory domain. Ablation experiments that delete the trailing NC cell subpopulation reveal that leading NC cells distribute all along the migratory pathway and develop a leading/trailing cellular orientation and gene expression profile that is predicted by model simulations. Transplantation experiments and model predictions that move trailing NC cells to the migratory front, or vice versa, reveal that cells adopt a gene expression profile and cell behaviors corresponding to the new position within the migratory stream. These results offer a mechanistic model in which leading cells create and respond to a cell-induced chemotactic gradient and transmit guidance information to trailing cells that use short-range signals to move in a directional manner.

Indexed as

Models, BiologicalAnimalsCell MovementChemotaxisChick EmbryoEmbryonic DevelopmentGene Expression ProfilingGene Expression Regulation, DevelopmentalModels, NeurologicalNeural CrestNeural Stem Cells

Identifiers

PMID22764050
PMCPMC3403103

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.