Evidence map›Paper›PMID 22763731›Full record

ReviewCurrent diabetes reports2012

Treg vaccination with a strong-agonistic insulin mimetope.

Benno Weigmann, Carolin Daniel

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Current diabetes reports, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact, top 90% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed, 0 citations in OpenAlex.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Benno WeigmannResearch Campus of the Friedrich-Alexander University Erlangen-Nuernberg, Medical Clinic I, 91052, Erlangen, Germany. benno.weigmann@uk-erlangen.de
Carolin Daniel
Dana-Farber Cancer Institute · USFriedrich-Alexander-Universität Erlangen-Nürnberg · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Foxp3(+) regulatory T (Treg) cells serve as a vital mechanism of negative regulation to maintain immunological self-tolerance thereby suppressing immune-mediated inflammation. The identification of the transcription factor Foxp3 as the specification factor for the Treg cell lineage facilitated our understanding in the biology of Treg generation and function. In the past, we carefully studied the extrathymic conversion of naive CD4(+) T cells into Foxp3(+) expressing Treg cells and found that this process is most efficient upon subimmunogenic supply of strong-agonistic T cell receptor (TCR) ligands avoiding activation of antigen-presenting and T cells. In contrast, weak-agonistic antigens fail to efficiently induce stable Foxp3(+) Treg cells irrespective of the applied dose. Here, we discuss the specific requirements for the establishment of Treg vaccination protocols to interfere with autoimmunity such as Type 1 diabetes.

Indexed as

AnimalsAutoimmunityDiabetes Mellitus, Type 1Forkhead Transcription FactorsHumansInsulinT-Lymphocytes, RegulatoryForkhead Transcription FactorsInsulin

Identifiers

PMID22763731
OpenAlexW2045317192

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.