Evidence map›Paper›PMID 22763667›Full record

ArticlePsychopharmacology2012

Discrimination of ethanol-nicotine drug mixtures in mice: dual interactive mechanisms of overshadowing and potentiation.

Matthew M Ford, Aubrey D McCracken, Natalie L Davis, Andrey E Ryabinin, Kathleen A Grant

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Psychopharmacology, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Critical needs in drug discovery for cessation of alcohol and nicotine polysubstance abuse.Progress in neuro-psychopharmacology & biological psychiatry · 2016
    Review
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Matthew M FordDepartment of Behavioral Neuroscience, Oregon Health & Science University, 3181 SW Sam Jackson Park Road, Portland, OR 97239-3098, USA. fordma@ohsu.edu
Aubrey D McCracken
Natalie L Davis
Andrey E Ryabinin
Kathleen A Grant

Funding

Translational measures of risk for excessive alcohol consumptionP60AA010760 · NIAAA · OREGON HEALTH & SCIENCE UNIVERSITY · PI TAMARA J. PHILLIPS · 2006 to 2026
$34.5M
Ghrelin antogonism and excessive drinkingU01AA016647 · NIAAA · OREGON HEALTH & SCIENCE UNIVERSITY · PI RYABININ, ANDREY E · 2006 to 2015
$2.5M
Urocortin, Edinger-Westphal nucleus &EtOH consumptionR01AA013738 · NIAAA · OREGON HEALTH & SCIENCE UNIVERSITY · PI RYABININ, ANDREY E · 2004 to 2010
$1.6M
Nicotine Modulation of Ethanol Consumption and DiscriminationK01AA016849 · NIAAA · OREGON HEALTH & SCIENCE UNIVERSITY · PI FORD, MATTHEW M · 2007 to 2011
$596k
NIAAA NIH HHS AA13738NIAAA NIH HHS AA16647NIAAA NIH HHS AA16849NIAAA NIH HHS K01 AA016849NIAAA NIH HHS P60 AA010760NIAAA NIH HHS R01 AA013738NIAAA NIH HHS U01 AA016647
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

rationaleOne possible basis for the proclivity of ethanol and nicotine co-abuse is an interaction between the discriminative stimulus (S(D)) effects of each drug.

objectivesThe current work sought to assess the discriminative control of ethanol and nicotine cues in mice trained with drug mixtures and to determine whether interactive mechanisms of overshadowing and potentiation occur.

methodsMale C57BL/6J mice were trained to discriminate ethanol (1.5 g/kg) alone or ethanol plus nicotine (0.4, 0.8, or 1.2 mg/kg base) in experiment 1 and nicotine (0.8 mg/kg) alone or nicotine plus ethanol (0.5, 1.0, or 2.0 g/kg) in experiment 2. Stimulus generalizations of the training mixtures to ethanol, nicotine, and the drug combination were assessed.

resultsEthanol (1.5 g/kg) retained discriminative control despite the inclusion of a progressively larger nicotine dose within the training mixtures in experiment 1. Although the nicotine S(D) was overshadowed by ethanol training doses > 0.5 g/kg in experiment 2, nicotine did potentiate the effects of low-dose ethanol.

conclusionsThese findings are suggestive of dual mechanisms whereby ethanol (>0.5 g/kg) overshadows the S(D) effects of nicotine, and at lower doses (<1 g/kg) the salience of ethanol's S(D) effects is potentiated by nicotine. These mechanisms may contribute to the escalation of concurrent drinking and smoking in a binge-like fashion.

Indexed as

AnimalsCuesDiscrimination LearningDose-Response Relationship, DrugDrug InteractionsEthanolMaleMiceMice, Inbred C57BLNicotineNicotinic AgonistsEthanolNicotineNicotinic Agonists

Identifiers

PMID22763667
PMCPMC3496813

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.