Evidence map›Paper›PMID 22761900›Full record

ArticlePloS one2012

Connecting network properties of rapidly disseminating epizoonotics.

Ariel L Rivas, Folorunso O Fasina, Almira L Hoogesteyn, Steven N Konah, José L Febles, Douglas J Perkins, James M Hyman, Jeanne M Fair, James B Hittner, Steven D Smith

Abstract readValidation Study
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
17citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

17 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Early network properties of the COVID-19 pandemic - The Chinese scenario.International journal of infectious diseases : IJID : official publication of the International Society for Infectious Diseases · 2020
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Ariel L RivasCenter for Global Health, Health Sciences Center, University of New Mexico, Albuquerque, New Mexico, United States of America. alrivas@unm.edu
Folorunso O Fasina
Almira L Hoogesteyn
Steven N Konah
José L Febles
Douglas J Perkins
James M Hyman
Jeanne M Fair
James B Hittner
Steven D Smith

Funding

TRAINING AND RESEARCH ON SEVERE MALARIAL ANEMIAD43TW005884 · FIC · UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH AT PITTSBURGH · PI Collins Ouma, Douglas Jay Perkins · 2002 to 2026
$5.2M
GENETIC BASIS OF SEVERE MALARIAL ANEMIAR01AI051305 · NIAID · UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH AT PITTSBURGH · PI PERKINS, DOUGLAS JAY · 2002 to 2011
$4.7M
FIC NIH HHS D43 TW005884NIAID NIH HHS R01 AI051305
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundTo effectively control the geographical dissemination of infectious diseases, their properties need to be determined. To test that rapid microbial dispersal requires not only susceptible hosts but also a pre-existing, connecting network, we explored constructs meant to reveal the network properties associated with disease spread, which included the road structure.

methodsUsing geo-temporal data collected from epizoonotics in which all hosts were susceptible (mammals infected by Foot-and-mouth disease virus, Uruguay, 2001; birds infected by Avian Influenza virus H5N1, Nigeria, 2006), two models were compared: 1) 'connectivity', a model that integrated bio-physical concepts (the agent's transmission cycle, road topology) into indicators designed to measure networks ('nodes' or infected sites with short- and long-range links), and 2) 'contacts', which focused on infected individuals but did not assess connectivity.

resultsTHE CONNECTIVITY MODEL SHOWED FIVE NETWORK PROPERTIES: 1) spatial aggregation of cases (disease clusters), 2) links among similar 'nodes' (assortativity), 3) simultaneous activation of similar nodes (synchronicity), 4) disease flows moving from highly to poorly connected nodes (directionality), and 5) a few nodes accounting for most cases (a "20:80" pattern). In both epizoonotics, 1) not all primary cases were connected but at least one primary case was connected, 2) highly connected, small areas (nodes) accounted for most cases, 3) several classes of nodes were distinguished, and 4) the contact model, which assumed all primary cases were identical, captured half the number of cases identified by the connectivity model. When assessed together, the synchronicity and directionality properties explained when and where an infectious disease spreads.

conclusionsGeo-temporal constructs of Network Theory's nodes and links were retrospectively validated in rapidly disseminating infectious diseases. They distinguished classes of cases, nodes, and networks, generating information usable to revise theory and optimize control measures. Prospective studies that consider pre-outbreak predictors, such as connecting networks, are recommended.

Indexed as

Disease OutbreaksAnimalsEpidemiologic StudiesGeographic Information SystemsHumansZoonoses

Identifiers

PMID22761900
PMCPMC3382573

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.