Evidence map›Paper›PMID 22761859›Full record

ArticlePloS one2012

Informed consent and placebo effects: a content analysis of information leaflets to identify what clinical trial participants are told about placebos.

Felicity L Bishop, Alison E M Adams, Ted J Kaptchuk, George T Lewith

Registry-linked trialOpen access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT04182295 (Effect of Information on Placebo in the Informed Consent on the Trial Outcomes and Participant Blinding), which is not on this map. Cited by 21 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
21citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.1field-weighted citation impact, top 23% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT04182295 nacompletednot on this mapstarted 2019, after this paper: background citation

Effect of Information on Placebo in the Informed Consent on the Trial Outcomes and Participant Blinding

TypeinterventionalSponsorKyunghee UniversityRan2019 to 2019Enrolled89ConditionsMuscle SorenessArmsacupuncture, Park Sham Needle
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

21 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 34 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Article
  6. Factors Underlying Patient and Surgeon Willingness to Participate in a Placebo Surgery Controlled trial: A Qualitative Investigation.Annals of surgery open : perspectives of surgical history, education, and clinical approaches · 2021
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Felicity L BishopPsychology, University of Southampton, Southampton, Hampshire, United Kingdom. F.L.Bishop@southampton.ac.uk
Alison E M Adams
Ted J Kaptchuk
George T Lewith
University of Southampton · GBHarvard University · USNorthern Arizona University · US

Funding

The Role of Context Effect in Acupuncture Treatment of Low Back/J.KongP01AT006663 · NCCIH · MASSACHUSETTS GENERAL HOSPITAL · PI HIRSCHTICK, RANDY L, ROSEN, BRUCE R · 2011 to 2017
$10.0M
Omics and Variable Responses to Placebo and Acupuncture in Irritable Bowel SyndroR01AT004662 · NCCIH · BETH ISRAEL DEACONESS MEDICAL CENTER · PI KAPTCHUK, TED, KOKKOTOU, EFI G. · 2009 to 2013
$2.3M
Mentoring and Research in Placebo Studies, Asian Medicine, and CAMK24AT004095 · NCCIH · HARVARD MEDICAL SCHOOL · PI KAPTCHUK, TED · 2007 to 2016
$1.4M
Arthritis Research UK 18099NCCIH NIH HHS K24 AT004095NCCIH NIH HHS P01 AT006663NCCIH NIH HHS R01 AT004662Versus Arthritis 18099
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundPlacebo groups are used in randomised clinical trials (RCTs) to control for placebo effects, which can be large. Participants in trials can misunderstand written information particularly regarding technical aspects of trial design such as randomisation; the adequacy of written information about placebos has not been explored. We aimed to identify what participants in major RCTs in the UK are told about placebos and their effects. METHODS AND

findingsWe conducted a content analysis of 45 Participant Information Leaflets (PILs) using quantitative and qualitative methodologies. PILs were obtained from trials on a major registry of current UK clinical trials (the UKCRN database). Eligible leaflets were received from 44 non-commercial trials but only 1 commercial trial. The main limitation is the low response rate (13.5%), but characteristics of included trials were broadly representative of all non-commercial trials on the database. 84% of PILs were for trials with 50:50 randomisation ratios yet in almost every comparison the target treatments were prioritized over the placebos. Placebos were referred to significantly less frequently than target treatments (7 vs. 27 mentions, p<001) and were significantly less likely than target treatments to be described as triggering either beneficial effects (1 vs. 45, p<001) or adverse effects (4 vs. 39, p<001). 8 PILs (18%) explicitly stated that the placebo treatment was either undesirable or ineffective.

conclusionsPILs from recent high quality clinical trials emphasise the benefits and adverse effects of the target treatment, while largely ignoring the possible effects of the placebo. Thus they provide incomplete and at times inaccurate information about placebos. Trial participants should be more fully informed about the health changes that they might experience from a placebo. To do otherwise jeopardises informed consent and is inconsistent with not only the science of placebos but also the fundamental rationale underpinning placebo controlled trials.

Indexed as

Clinical Trials as TopicInformed ConsentPlacebo EffectHumansUnited Kingdom

Identifiers

PMID22761859
PMCPMC3384614
OpenAlexW2153290253

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.