ArticlePloS one2012
Modeling collective animal behavior with a cognitive perspective: a methodological framework.
Article in PloS one, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
17 citing papers in PubMed, 40 citations in OpenAlex.
- Closed-loop real-virtual interactions validate 3D model of social coordination in fish.PLoS computational biology · 2026Article
- Away from the herd: loneliness as a dysfunction of social alignment.Social cognitive and affective neuroscience · 2024Article
- Tuning social interactions' strength drives collective response to light intensity in schooling fish.PLoS computational biology · 2023Article
- Modeling bee movement shows how a perceptual masking effect can influence flower discovery.PLoS computational biology · 2023Article
- The visual coupling between neighbours explains local interactions underlying human 'flocking'.Proceedings. Biological sciences · 2022Article
- Coordination of movement via complementary interactions of leaders and followers in termite mating pairs.Proceedings. Biological sciences · 2021Article
- A data-driven method for reconstructing and modelling social interactions in moving animal groups.Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences · 2020Article
- Multi-scale analysis and modelling of collective migration in biological systems.Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences · 2020Article
- Collective Motion in Human Crowds.Current directions in psychological science · 2018Article
- Local interactions underlying collective motion in human crowds.Proceedings. Biological sciences · 2018Article
- Ontogeny of collective behavior reveals a simple attraction rule.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2017Article
- Delayed response and biosonar perception explain movement coordination in trawling bats.PLoS computational biology · 2015Article
- Diffusion and topological neighbours in flocks of starlings: relating a model to empirical data.PloS one · 2015Article
- Reconsidering the importance of the past in predator-prey models: both numerical and functional responses depend on delayed prey densities.Proceedings. Biological sciences · 2013Article
- How do ants make sense of gravity? A Boltzmann Walker analysis of Lasius niger trajectories on various inclines.PloS one · 2013Article
- From behavioural analyses to models of collective motion in fish schools.Interface focus · 2012Review
- The modelling cycle for collective animal behaviour.Interface focus · 2012Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The last decades have seen an increasing interest in modeling collective animal behavior. Some studies try to reproduce as accurately as possible the collective dynamics and patterns observed in several animal groups with biologically plausible, individual behavioral rules. The objective is then essentially to demonstrate that the observed collective features may be the result of self-organizing processes involving quite simple individual behaviors. Other studies concentrate on the objective of establishing or enriching links between collective behavior researches and cognitive or physiological ones, which then requires that each individual rule be carefully validated. Here we discuss the methodological consequences of this additional requirement. Using the example of corpse clustering in ants, we first illustrate that it may be impossible to discriminate among alternative individual rules by considering only observational data collected at the group level. Six individual behavioral models are described: They are clearly distinct in terms of individual behaviors, they all reproduce satisfactorily the collective dynamics and distribution patterns observed in experiments, and we show theoretically that it is strictly impossible to discriminate two of these models even in the limit of an infinite amount of data whatever the accuracy level. A set of methodological steps are then listed and discussed as practical ways to partially overcome this problem. They involve complementary experimental protocols specifically designed to address the behavioral rules successively, conserving group-level data for the overall model validation. In this context, we highlight the importance of maintaining a sharp distinction between model enunciation, with explicit references to validated biological concepts, and formal translation of these concepts in terms of quantitative state variables and fittable functional dependences. Illustrative examples are provided of the benefits expected during the often long and difficult process of refining a behavioral model, designing adapted experimental protocols and inversing model parameters.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.