Evidence map›Paper›PMID 22761593›Full record

ArticlePLoS genetics2012

Incompatibility and competitive exclusion of genomic segments between sibling Drosophila species.

Shu Fang, Roman Yukilevich, Ying Chen, David A Turissini, Kai Zeng, Ian A Boussy, Chung-I Wu

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PLoS genetics, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. What are species and how are they formed?National science review · 2022
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Death of new microRNA genes inGenome research · 2018
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Shu FangBiodiversity Research Center, Academia Sinica, Taipei, Taiwan, Republic of China. zofang@sinica.edu.tw
Roman Yukilevich
Ying Chen
David A Turissini
Kai Zeng
Ian A Boussy
Chung-I Wu

Funding

Transcriptional and genic basis of incipient speciationR01GM063144 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF CHICAGO · PI WU, CHUNG-I · 2001 to 2008
$2.4M
NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM063144
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The extent and nature of genetic incompatibilities between incipient races and sibling species is of fundamental importance to our view of speciation. However, with the exception of hybrid inviability and sterility factors, little is known about the extent of other, more subtle genetic incompatibilities between incipient species. Here we experimentally demonstrate the prevalence of such genetic incompatibilities between two young allopatric sibling species, Drosophila simulans and D. sechellia. Our experiments took advantage of 12 introgression lines that carried random introgressed D. sechellia segments in different parts of the D. simulans genome. First, we found that these introgression lines did not show any measurable sterility or inviability effects. To study if these sechellia introgressions in a simulans background contained other fitness consequences, we competed and genetically tracked the marked alleles within each introgression against the wild-type alleles for 20 generations. Strikingly, all marked D. sechellia introgression alleles rapidly decreased in frequency in only 6 to 7 generations. We then developed computer simulations to model our competition results. These simulations indicated that selection against D. sechellia introgression alleles was high (average s = 0.43) and that the marker alleles and the incompatible alleles did not separate in 78% of the introgressions. The latter result likely implies that most introgressions contain multiple genetic incompatibilities. Thus, this study reveals that, even at early stages of speciation, many parts of the genome diverge to a point where introducing foreign elements has detrimental fitness consequences, but which cannot be seen using standard sterility and inviability assays.

Indexed as

Genetic SpeciationReproductive IsolationAllelesAnimalsChromosome MappingDrosophilaGenetic FitnessGenome, InsectHybridization, GeneticInfertilitySelection, GeneticSpecies Specificity

Identifiers

PMID22761593
PMCPMC3386244

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.