Evidence map›Paper›PMID 22761527›Full record

Trial reportAmerican journal of pharmaceutical education2012

Pharmacy student knowledge retention after completing either a simulated or written patient case.

Shaunta' M Ray, Douglas R Wylie, A Shaun Rowe, Eric Heidel, Andrea S Franks

Abstract readComparative StudyRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in American journal of pharmaceutical education, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. The Past, Present, and Future of Virtual Reality in Pharmacy Education.American journal of pharmaceutical education · 2019
    Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Knowledge Gain of Pharmacy Students and Pharmacists Comparing Simulation Versus Traditional Learning Methodology.The journal of pediatric pharmacology and therapeutics : JPPT : the official journal of PPAG
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Shaunta' M RayUniversity of Tennessee Health Science Center College of Pharmacy, Knoxville, USA. smray@uthsc.edu
Douglas R Wylie
A Shaun Rowe
Eric Heidel
Andrea S Franks

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveTo determine pharmacy students' knowledge retention from and comfort level with a patient-case simulation compared with a written patient case.

designPharmacy students were randomly assigned to participate in either a written patient case or a simulated patient case in which a high-fidelity mannequin was used to portray a patient experiencing a narcotic and acetaminophen overdose. ASSESSMENT: Participants' responses on a multiple-choice test and a survey instrument administered before the case, immediately after the case, and 25 days later indicated that participation in the simulated patient case did not result in greater knowledge retention or comfort level than participation in the written patient case. Students' knowledge improved post-intervention regardless of which teaching method was used.

conclusionsAlthough further research is needed to determine whether the use of simulation in the PharmD curriculum is equivalent or superior to other teaching methods, students' enthusiasm for learning in a simulated environment where they can safely apply patient care skills make this technology worth exploring.

Indexed as

Health Knowledge, Attitudes, PracticeManikinsStudents, PharmacyAcetaminophenAnalgesics, OpioidClinical CompetenceCurriculumEducational MeasurementEducation, PharmacyHumansPatient CarePrescription Drug MisuseRetention, PsychologySoftwareTeachingTime FactorsAcetaminophenAnalgesics, Opioidmannequinspharmacy educationsimulated patientsimulation

Identifiers

PMID22761527
PMCPMC3386037

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.