ArticleAmerican journal of pharmaceutical education2012
An online knowledge resource and questionnaires as a continuing pharmacy education tool to document reflective learning.
Article in American journal of pharmaceutical education, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
11 citing papers in PubMed.
- Continuing Pharmacy Education: Exploring the Status and Future Prospects in Nepal.Advances in medical education and practice · 2022Article
- A Student-Led Elective Provides Quality Improvement Feedback for a Required Compounding Course.American journal of pharmaceutical education · 2020Article
- A Systematic Review of Models Used and Preferences for Continuing Education and Continuing Professional Development of Pharmacists.Pharmacy (Basel, Switzerland) · 2019Review
- Community pharmacists' knowledge, attitude, and practice of Irritable Bowel Syndrome (IBS): the impact of training courses.Advances in medical education and practice · 2019Article
- Student Self-Analysis of Their Nonsterile Preparations and its Effect on Compounding Confidence.American journal of pharmaceutical education · 2018Article
- When Educational Material Is Delivered: A Mixed Methods Content Validation Study of the Information Assessment Method.JMIR medical education · 2017Article
- A Retrospective Study on Students' and Teachers' Perceptions of the Reflective Ability Clinical Assessment.American journal of pharmaceutical education · 2016Article
- The Effect of Reflective Activities on Reflective Thinking Ability in an Undergraduate Pharmacy Curriculum.American journal of pharmaceutical education · 2016Article
- Learning and networking: utilization of a primary care listserv by pharmacists.The Canadian journal of hospital pharmacy · 2014Article
- Reflective practice and its implications for pharmacy education.American journal of pharmaceutical education · 2014Review
- In pursuit of a valid Information Assessment Method for continuing education: a mixed methods study.BMC medical education · 2013Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
objectiveTo assess the use of an electronic knowledge resource to document continuing education activities and reveal educational needs of practicing pharmacists.
methodsOver a 38-week period, 67 e-mails were sent to 6,500 Canadian Pharmacists Association (CPhA) members. Each e-mail contained a link to an e-Therapeutics+ Highlight, a factual excerpt of selected content from an online drug and therapeutic knowledge resource. Participants were then prompted to complete a pop-up questionnaire.
resultsMembers completed 4,140 questionnaires. Participants attributed the information they learned in the Highlights to practice improvements (50.4%), learning (57.0%), and motivation to learn more (57.4%).
conclusionsReading Highlight excerpts and completing Web-based questionnaires is an effective method of continuing education that could be easily documented and tracked, making it an effective tool for use with e-portfolios.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.