Evidence map›Paper›PMID 22761298›Full record

ArticleClinical and vaccine immunology : CVI2012

Lipopolysaccharide heterogeneity in the atypical group of novel emerging Brucella species.

Michel S Zygmunt, Isabelle Jacques, Nelly Bernardet, Axel Cloeckaert

Open access · diamondAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Clinical and vaccine immunology : CVI, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 24 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
24citing papers in PubMed
3.3field-weighted citation impact, top 9% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

24 citing papers in PubMed, 36 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. TheAnnual review of microbiology · 2023
    Review
  3. The Retrospective on AtypicalMicroorganisms · 2022
    Review
  4. Uncovering the Hidden Credentials ofMicrobiology and molecular biology reviews : MMBR · 2021
    Review
  5. When the Going Gets Rough: The Significance ofFrontiers in microbiology · 2021
    Review
  6. Article
  7. The Role of the Flagellar Protein FlgJ in the Virulence ofFrontiers in cellular and infection microbiology · 2020
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Lethality ofVirulence · 2019
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Phenotypic and Molecular Characterization ofFrontiers in veterinary science · 2018
    Article
  13. The Fast-GrowingFrontiers in microbiology · 2018
    Article
  14. WadD, a NewFrontiers in microbiology · 2018
    Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Toll-Like Receptors 2 and 4 Cooperate in the Control of the Emerging PathogenFrontiers in cellular and infection microbiology · 2016
    Article
  18. AFrontiers in cellular and infection microbiology · 2016
    Article
  19. Article
  20. Smooth to Rough Dissociation in Brucella: The Missing Link to Virulence.Frontiers in cellular and infection microbiology · 2015
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Michel S ZygmuntINRA, UMR1282 Infectiologie et Santé Publique, Nouzilly, France. Michel.Zygmunt@tours.inra.fr
Isabelle Jacques
Nelly Bernardet
Axel Cloeckaert
Infectiologie Animale et Santé Publique · FRUniversité de Tours · FR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Recently, novel Brucella strains with phenotypic characteristics that were atypical for strains belonging to the genus Brucella have been reported. Phenotypically many of these strains were initially misidentified as Ochrobactrum spp. Two novel species have been described so far for these strains, i.e., B. microti and B. inopinata, and other strains genetically related to B. inopinata may constitute other novel species as well. In this study, we analyzed the lipopolysaccharides (LPS) (smooth LPS [S-LPS] and rough LPS [R-LPS]) of these atypical strains using different methods and a panel of monoclonal antibodies (MAbs) directed against several epitopes of the Brucella O-polysaccharide (O-PS) and R-LPS. Among the most striking results, Brucella sp. strain BO2, isolated from a patient with chronic destructive pneumonia, showed a completely distinct S-LPS profile in silver stain gels that looked more similar to that of enterobacterial S-LPS. This strain also failed to react with MAbs against Brucella O-PS epitopes and showed weak reactivity with anti-R-LPS MAbs. B. inopinata reference strain BO1 displayed an M-dominant S-LPS type with some heterogeneity relative to the classical M-dominant Brucella S-LPS type. Australian wild rodent strains belonging also to the B. inopinata group showed a classical A-dominant S-LPS but lacked the O-PS common (C) epitopes, as previously reported for B. suis biovar 2 strains. Interestingly, some strains also failed to react with anti-R-LPS MAbs, such as the B. microti reference strain and B. inopinata BO1, suggesting modifications in the core-lipid A moieties of these strains. These results have several implications for serological typing and serological diagnosis and underline the need for novel tools for detection and correct identification of such novel emerging Brucella spp.

Indexed as

AnimalsAntibodies, BacterialAntibodies, MonoclonalBrucellaBrucellosisElectrophoresisHumansLipopolysaccharidesO AntigensAntibodies, BacterialAntibodies, MonoclonalLipopolysaccharidesO Antigens

Identifiers

PMID22761298
PMCPMC3428386
OpenAlexW2163232838

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.