ArticleFamilial cancer2012
Advanced duodenal disease in familial adenomatous polyposis: how frequently should patients be followed up after successful therapy?
Article in Familial cancer, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 17 citations in OpenAlex.
- Updated European guidelines for clinical management of familial adenomatous polyposis (FAP), MUTYH-associated polyposis (MAP), gastric adenocarcinoma, proximal polyposis of the stomach (GAPPS) and other rare adenomatous polyposis syndromes: a joint EHTG-ESCP revision.The British journal of surgery · 2024Guideline
- Hereditary Colorectal Cancer Syndromes: Small Bowel Cancer Risk and Endoscopic Surveillance Strategies.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Review
- Endoscopic management of duodenal adenomatosis in familial adenomatous polyposis-A case-based review.United European gastroenterology journal · 2021Review
- Primary small bowel adenomas and adenocarcinomas-recent advances.Virchows Archiv : an international journal of pathology · 2018Review
- Pancreas-sparing total duodenectomy for Spigelman stage IV duodenal polyposis associated with familial adenomatous polyposis: experience of 10 cases at a single institution.Familial cancer · 2017Article
- "High rate of recurrent adenomatosis during endoscopic surveillance after duodenectomy in patients with familial adenomatous polyposis".Familial cancer · 2013Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Duodenal polyposis is found in the majority of patients with familial adenomatous polyposis. Endoscopic surveillance programmes grade the severity of duodenal disease according to the Spigelman classification (stages 0-IV) to identify patients at risk of developing adenocarcinoma. To evaluate the progression of duodenal polyposis in patients with a previous diagnosis of Spigelman stage IV disease who have been downstaged by endoscopic or pharmacological means. A database search of a large polyposis registry identified patients who had been downstaged from stage IV disease and had further opportunity for disease progression. These patients were divided into three groups according to their new Spigelman stage. A measure of a patient's disease progression was obtained by the increase in stage over the recommended follow up time period for their new, reduced, Spigelman stage. Group 1 (n = 16) were downstaged to stage III disease, with 50 % progressing back to stage IV over the recommended 1-year follow up period. Group 2 (n = 19) were downstaged to stage II disease, with 84 % progressing over the recommended 3-year follow up period. Group 3 (n = 6) were downstaged to stage I disease, with 100 % progressing over the recommended 5-year follow up period. Patients downstaged from Spigelman stage IV demonstrate an increased rate of disease progression in comparison to reported rates of primary disease progression. An amendment to the current endoscopic surveillance protocol is recommended to ensure that once a patient has been diagnosed with stage IV disease they are treated as a high-risk patient in perpetuity.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.