ArticleInternational journal of public health2012
Prevalence of exposure to occupational risks during pregnancy in Spain.
Article in International journal of public health, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
10 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Maternal Occupational Risk Factors and Preterm Birth: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.Public health reviews · 2023Pooled it
- Maternal occupational risk factors and preterm birth: Protocol for a systematic review and meta-analysis.PloS one · 2023Article
- Article
- Occupation and maternal mortality in Brazil.Revista de saude publica · 2020Article
- [Effect of employment and domestic load on fetal development and length of gestation in a birth cohort study].Revista espanola de salud publica · 2018Article
- Data linkage between the National Birth Defects Prevention Study and the Occupational Information Network (O*NET) to assess workplace physical activity, sedentary behaviors, and emotional stressors during pregnancy.American journal of industrial medicine · 2016Article
- Risk factors involved in orofacial cleft predisposition - review.Open medicine (Warsaw, Poland) · 2015Review
- Occupational risks and pregnancy and infant health outcomes in Florida farmworkers.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2014Article
- Effects of occupational stress on the gastrointestinal tract.World journal of gastrointestinal pathophysiology · 2013Review
- PPTOX III: environmental stressors in the developmental origins of disease--evidence and mechanisms.Toxicological sciences : an official journal of the Society of Toxicology · 2013Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectivesWe describe reported exposures to main categories of occupational agents and conditions in Spanish pregnant workers.
methodsWomen were recruited at 12th week of pregnancy from main public gynaecological consults to be included in the INMA Spanish cohorts study (n=2,058). Through personal interviews with structured questionnaires, information on working situation and working conditions during pregnancy was obtained.
resultsFifty percent of the women reported frequent exposure to physical load (standing, heavy lifting) and 45% reported exposure to three or more indicators of job strain. Exposure to at least one physical agent (noise, vibrations, etc.) affected 25% of the women. Exposure to chemicals was reported by 20% of the women, mostly including solvents and cleaning products. Eight percent of the women worked at night shifts. Job strain was more prevalent in office workers and industrial operators. Industrial workers showed the highest prevalence of exposure to chemical and physical pollutants.
conclusionsOur data suggest that working conditions of pregnant women may need increased control in Spain.
Indexed as
Identifiers
22760548What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.