Evidence map›Paper›PMID 22760523›Full record

ReviewJournal of nuclear cardiology : official publication of the American Society of Nuclear Cardiology2012

Prognosis in the era of comparative effectiveness research: where is nuclear cardiology now and where should it be?

Leslee J Shaw, Fadi G Hage, Daniel S Berman, Rory Hachamovitch, Ami Iskandrian

Erratum issuedAbstract readComparative StudyReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Journal of nuclear cardiology : official publication of the American Society of Nuclear Cardiology, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 74 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
74citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

74 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Negative predictive value of stress myocardial perfusion imaging and coronary computed tomography angiography: A meta-analysis.Journal of nuclear cardiology : official publication of the American Society of Nuclear Cardiology · 2018
    Pooled it
  2. Long-term prognostic value of stress myocardial perfusion imaging and coronary computed tomography angiography: A meta-analysis.Journal of nuclear cardiology : official publication of the American Society of Nuclear Cardiology · 2016
    Pooled it
  3. Guideline
  4. Trial
  5. Trial
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Guideline for Chronic Coronary Syndrome - 2025.Arquivos brasileiros de cardiologia · 2025
    Article
  9. Future of Radionuclide Myocardial Perfusion Imaging: Transitioning from SPECT to PET.Journal of nuclear medicine : official publication, Society of Nuclear Medicine · 2023
    Article
  10. Prognostic value of absent left ventricular ejection fraction reserve with regadenoson SPECT MPI.Journal of nuclear cardiology : official publication of the American Society of Nuclear Cardiology · 2022
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Is SPECT myocardial perfusion imaging on its dying bed?Journal of nuclear cardiology : official publication of the American Society of Nuclear Cardiology · 2021
    Article
  13. Stress myocardial perfusion imaging: Can we tell the results without doing the test?Journal of nuclear cardiology : official publication of the American Society of Nuclear Cardiology · 2021
    Article
  14. The prognostic value of myocardial perfusion imaging in patients with type 2 myocardial infarction.Journal of nuclear cardiology : official publication of the American Society of Nuclear Cardiology · 2021
    Article
  15. Review of cardiovascular imaging in the Journal of Nuclear Cardiology 2019: Single-photon emission computed tomography.Journal of nuclear cardiology : official publication of the American Society of Nuclear Cardiology · 2020
    Review
  16. Myocardial perfusion stress test: is it worth?The international journal of cardiovascular imaging · 2020
    Article
  17. Myocardial perfusion imaging prior to coronary revascularization: From risk stratification to procedure guidance.Journal of nuclear cardiology : official publication of the American Society of Nuclear Cardiology · 2019
    Article
  18. Risk stratification for renal transplantation: A role for heart rate response?Journal of nuclear cardiology : official publication of the American Society of Nuclear Cardiology · 2019
    Article
  19. Stable Ischemic Heart Disease in Women.Current treatment options in cardiovascular medicine · 2018
    Review
  20. Review of cardiovascular imaging in the Journal of Nuclear Cardiology in 2017. Part 2 of 2: Myocardial perfusion imaging.Journal of nuclear cardiology : official publication of the American Society of Nuclear Cardiology · 2018
    Review

14 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Leslee J ShawEmory Clinical Cardiovascular Research Institute, Emory University School of Medicine, 1462 Clifton Road NE, Room 529, Atlanta, GA 30324, USA. lshaw3@emory.edu
Fadi G Hage
Daniel S Berman
Rory Hachamovitch
Ami Iskandrian

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

PubMed holds no abstract for this paper.

Indexed as

CardiologyComparative Effectiveness ResearchNuclear MedicineExercise TestHeart RateHumansMyocardial Perfusion ImagingPositron-Emission TomographyPractice Guidelines as TopicPrognosisRandomized Controlled Trials as TopicTomography, Emission-Computed, Single-PhotonTomography, X-Ray Computed

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.