ReviewCurrent osteoporosis reports2012
Pharmacogenetics of osteoporosis: what is the evidence?
Review in Current osteoporosis reports, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed, 13 citations in OpenAlex.
- Bridging Genomic Research Disparities in Osteoporosis GWAS: Insights for Diverse Populations.Current osteoporosis reports · 2025Review
- Article
- Western-type diet differentially modulates osteoblast, osteoclast, and lipoblast differentiation and activation in a background of APOE deficiency.Laboratory investigation; a journal of technical methods and pathology · 2018Article
- Apolipoprotein A-1 regulates osteoblast and lipoblast precursor cells in mice.Laboratory investigation; a journal of technical methods and pathology · 2016Article
- Clinical impact of recent genetic discoveries in osteoporosis.The application of clinical genetics · 2013Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The early genetic prediction of personal drug therapy outcome, both in terms of identification of poor responders or nonresponders, as well as of subjects at risk of developing adverse reactions, and its translation into the clinical practice are the main challenges of personalized medicine. The application of pharmacogenetic predictive tests will be very useful mostly in cases of chronic disorders, as in metabolic bone diseases, that require long-term treatments and for whom exist effective differently acting drugs to be alternatively chosen. Pharmacogenetic tests, prior to drug administration, would hypothetically grant the optimization of drug therapy, based on patient's genotype, to ensure maximum efficacy with minimal adverse effects. This review aims to offer an overview on the principal findings in the field of pharmacogenetics of osteoporosis, and it will discuss future perspectives and possible clinical applications of pharmacogenetic tests for antiresorptive drugs.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.