Evidence map›Paper›PMID 22760419›Full record

ArticleJournal of neuro-oncology2012

Molecular imaging of pediatric brain tumors: comparison of tumor metabolism using ¹⁸F-FDG-PET and MRSI.

Sean J Hipp, Emilie A Steffen-Smith, Nicholas Patronas, Peter Herscovitch, Jeffrey M Solomon, Robyn S Bent, Seth M Steinberg, Katherine E Warren

Abstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of neuro-oncology, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed
1.1field-weighted citation impact, top 23% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed, 25 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Advanced MR imaging andEuropean journal of nuclear medicine and molecular imaging · 2019
    Article
  6. Review
  7. The British journal of radiology · 2019
    Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. PET and SPECT studies in children with hemispheric low-grade gliomas.Child's nervous system : ChNS : official journal of the International Society for Pediatric Neurosurgery · 2016
    Review
  12. Review
  13. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 6 institutions in 2 countries.

Sean J HippPediatric Oncology Branch, Center for Cancer Research, National Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health, 9000 Rockville Pike, Bethesda, MD 20892, USA.
Emilie A Steffen-Smith
Nicholas Patronas
Peter Herscovitch
Jeffrey M Solomon
Robyn S Bent
Seth M Steinberg
Katherine E Warren
National Cancer Institute · USNational Institutes of Health Clinical Center · USCenter for Cancer Research · USGroup Image (Poland) · PLNational Institutes of Health · USWalter Reed National Military Medical Center · US

Funding

Office of Collaborative BiostatisticsZIDSC007202 · NCI · DIVISION OF CLINICAL SCIENCES - NCI · PI CHOO-WOSOBA, HYOYOUNG · 2009 to 2025
$14.5M
Noninvasive Evaluation of Pediatric CNS TumorsRAPNOZIABC011299 · NCI · DIVISION OF BASIC SCIENCES - NCI · PI WARREN, KATHERINE E · 2010 to 2019
$1.0M
Imaging as a Biomarker for Diffuse Intrinsic Brainstem GliomasZIABC010589 · NCI · DIVISION OF BASIC SCIENCES - NCI · PI WARREN, KATHERINE E · 2009 to 2013
$630k
A Comparative Study of Pediatric CNS Tumor Activity as Assessed by18F-- FDG PET Z01BC010582 · NCI · BASIC SCIENCES · PI WARREN, KATHERINE E · 2005 to 2007
$164k
Intramural NIH HHS Z01 BC010582
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Magnetic resonance spectroscopic imaging (MRSI) and (18)F-fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography (FDG-PET) are non-invasive imaging techniques routinely used to evaluate tumor malignancy in adults with brain tumors. We compared the metabolic activity of pediatric brain tumors using FDG-PET and MRSI. Children (n = 37) diagnosed with a primary brain tumor underwent FDG-PET and MRSI within two weeks of each other. Tumor metabolism was classified as inactive, active or highly active using the maximum choline:N-acetyl-asparate (Cho:NAA) on MRSI and the highest tumor uptake on FDG-PET. A voxel-wise comparison was used to evaluate the area with the greatest abnormal metabolism. Agreement between methods was assessed using the percent agreement and the kappa statistic (κ). Pediatric brain tumors were metabolically heterogeneous on FDG-PET and MRSI studies. Active tumor metabolism was observed more frequently using MRSI compared to FDG-PET, and agreement in tumor classification was weak (κ = 0.16, p = 0.12), with 42 % agreement (95 % CI = 25-61 %). Voxel-wise comparison for identifying the area of greatest metabolic activity showed overlap in the majority (62 %) of studies, though exact agreement between techniques was low (29.4 %, 95 % CI = 15.1-47.5 %). These results indicate that FDG-PET and MRSI detect similar but not always identical regions of tumor activity, and there is little agreement in the degree of tumor metabolic activity between the two techniques.

Indexed as

AdolescentBrain NeoplasmsChildChild, PreschoolFemaleFluorodeoxyglucose F18HumansImage Interpretation, Computer-AssistedMagnetic Resonance ImagingMaleMolecular ImagingPositron-Emission TomographyRadiopharmaceuticalsYoung AdultFluorodeoxyglucose F18Radiopharmaceuticals

Identifiers

PMID22760419
PMCPMC3482688
OpenAlexW2064941117

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.