SynthesisMolecular biology reports2012
Association between estrogen receptor alpha c.454-397T>C and c.454-351A>G and ischemic stroke risk: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
Synthesis in Molecular biology reports, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Association of Estrogen Receptor-α and Aryl Hydrocarbon Receptor Gene Polymorphisms with Ischemic Stroke in an Egyptian Population: A Pilot Study.Journal of molecular neuroscience : MN · 2024Article
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The association between estrogen receptor alpha (ESR1) c.454-397T>C and c.454-351A>G polymorphism and ischemic stroke remains controversial. The aim of this study was to perform a meta-analysis to investigate a more authentic association between c.454-397T>C and c.454-351A>G mutation and ischemic stroke. Systematic searches of electronic databases Embase, PubMed, Web of Science as well as hand-searching of the references of identified articles and the meeting abstracts were performed. Study selection, data abstraction and study quality evaluation were independently conducted in duplicate. Statistical analyses were performed using software Stata 11.0. The pooled odds ratios (ORs) with 95 % confidence intervals (95 % CIs) were performed. Different effect models were used according to the difference in heterogeneity. Publication bias was tested by Begg's funnel plot and Egger's regression test. For c.454-397T>C mutation, five studies were combined. Significant association was found in allelic model (OR = 1.12, 95 % CI = 1.01-1.25, p = 0.03), additive model (OR = 1.25, 95 % CI = 1.01-1.54, p = 0.04), and recessive model (OR = 1.23, 95 % CI = 1.02-1.49, p = 0.03), whereas no evidence of association was found for dominant model (OR = 1.10, 95 % CI = 0.85-1.42, p = 0.47). For c.454-351A>G mutation, no evidence of association was found for all genetic models. Our meta-analysis suggests that ESR1 c.454-397T>C mutation is significantly associated with increased risk of ischemic stroke, whereas no evidence of association was found for ESR1 c.454-351A>G mutation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
22760258What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.