Evidence map›Paper›PMID 22759862›Full record

ArticleGenome research2012

Systematic elucidation and in vivo validation of sequences enriched in hindbrain transcriptional control.

Grzegorz M Burzynski, Xylena Reed, Leila Taher, Zachary E Stine, Takeshi Matsui, Ivan Ovcharenko, Andrew S McCallion

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Genome research, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed, 20 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Grzegorz M BurzynskiMcKusick-Nathans Institute of Genetic Medicine, Department of Molecular and Comparative Pathobiology, The Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD 21205, USA.
Xylena Reed
Leila Taher
Zachary E Stine
Takeshi Matsui
Ivan Ovcharenko
Andrew S McCallion
Johns Hopkins University · USNational Institutes of Health · US

Funding

Regulatory landscape of the human genome: comparative and evolutionary analysis.ZIALM200881 · NLM · NATIONAL LIBRARY OF MEDICINE · PI OVCHARENKO, IVAN · 2009 to 2025
$20.1M
Predoctoral Training Program in Human GeneticsT32GM007814 · NIGMS · JOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY · PI VALLE, DAVID · 1985 to 2021
$10.6M
Development of a Neuronal Regulatory LexiconR01NS062972 · NINDS · JOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY · PI MCCALLION, ANDREW S · 2009 to 2018
$4.1M
Intramural NIH HHSNIGMS NIH HHS GM07814NIGMS NIH HHS T32 GM007814NINDS NIH HHS NS062972NINDS NIH HHS R01 NS062972
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Illuminating the primary sequence encryption of enhancers is central to understanding the regulatory architecture of genomes. We have developed a machine learning approach to decipher motif patterns of hindbrain enhancers and identify 40,000 sequences in the human genome that we predict display regulatory control that includes the hindbrain. Consistent with their roles in hindbrain patterning, MEIS1, NKX6-1, as well as HOX and POU family binding motifs contributed strongly to this enhancer model. Predicted hindbrain enhancers are overrepresented at genes expressed in hindbrain and associated with nervous system development, and primarily reside in the areas of open chromatin. In addition, 77 (0.2%) of these predictions are identified as hindbrain enhancers on the VISTA Enhancer Browser, and 26,000 (60%) overlap enhancer marks (H3K4me1 or H3K27ac). To validate these putative hindbrain enhancers, we selected 55 elements distributed throughout our predictions and six low scoring controls for evaluation in a zebrafish transgenic assay. When assayed in mosaic transgenic embryos, 51/55 elements directed expression in the central nervous system. Furthermore, 30/34 (88%) predicted enhancers analyzed in stable zebrafish transgenic lines directed expression in the larval zebrafish hindbrain. Subsequent analysis of sequence fragments selected based upon motif clustering further confirmed the critical role of the motifs contributing to the classifier. Our results demonstrate the existence of a primary sequence code characteristic to hindbrain enhancers. This code can be accurately extracted using machine-learning approaches and applied successfully for de novo identification of hindbrain enhancers. This study represents a critical step toward the dissection of regulatory control in specific neuronal subtypes.

Indexed as

Enhancer Elements, GeneticTranscription, GeneticAlgorithmsAnimalsChromatinGene Expression Regulation, DevelopmentalGenome, HumanHomeodomain ProteinsHumansPOU Domain FactorsRhombencephalonSequence Analysis, DNATranscription FactorsZebrafishChromatinHomeodomain ProteinsMEIS2 protein, humanNKX6-1 protein, humanPOU Domain FactorsTranscription Factors

Identifiers

PMID22759862
PMCPMC3483557
OpenAlexW2149744269

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.