Evidence map›Paper›PMID 22759834›Full record

ArticleBMC family practice2012

Pressure during decision making of continuous sedation in end-of-life situations in Dutch general practice.

Marco H Blanker, Marlies Koerhuis-Roessink, Siebe J Swart, Wouter W A Zuurmond, Agnes van der Heide, Roberto S G M Perez, Judith A C Rietjens

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC family practice, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
3.5field-weighted citation impact, top 8% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 29 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Palliative sedation in advanced cancer patients hospitalized in a specialized palliative care unit.Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer · 2018
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Palliative sedation in Dutch general practice from 2005 to 2011: a dynamic cohort study of trends and reasons.The British journal of general practice : the journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners · 2013
    Article
  4. Opinions of the Dutch public on palliative sedation: a mixed-methods approach.The British journal of general practice : the journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners · 2013
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Marco H BlankerUniversity of Groningen, University Medical Center Groningen, Department of General Practice, the Netherlands. blanker@belvederelaan.nl
Marlies Koerhuis-Roessink
Siebe J Swart
Wouter W A Zuurmond
Agnes van der Heide
Roberto S G M Perez
Judith A C Rietjens
Erasmus MC · NLEMGO Institute for Health and Care Research · NLUniversity Medical Center Groningen · NLUniversity of Groningen · NL

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundLittle is known about pressure from patients or relatives on physician's decision making of continuous palliative sedation. We aim to describe experienced pressure by general practitioners (GPs) in cases of continuous sedation after the introduction of the Dutch practice guideline, using a questionnaire survey.

methodsA sample of 918 Dutch GPs were invited to fill out a questionnaire about their last patient under continuous sedation. Cases in which GPs experienced pressure from the patient, relatives or other persons were compared to those without pressure.

results399 of 918 invite GPs (43%) returned the questionnaire and 250 provided detailed information about their most recent case of continuous sedation. Forty-one GPs (16%) indicated to have experienced pressure from the patient, relatives or colleagues. In GPs younger than 50, guideline knowledge was not related to experienced pressure, whereas in older GPs, 15% with and 36% without guideline knowledge reported pressure. GPs experienced pressure more often when patients had psychological symptoms (compared to physical symptoms only) and when patients had a longer estimated life expectancy. A euthanasia request of the patient coincided with a higher prevalence of pressure for GPs without, but not for GPs with previous experience with euthanasia. GPs who experienced pressure had consulted a palliative consultation team more often than GPs who did not experience pressure.

conclusionOne in six GPs felt pressure from patients or relatives to start sedation. This pressure was related to guideline knowledge, especially in older GPs, longer life expectancy and the presence of a euthanasia request, especially for GPs without previous experience of euthanasia.

Indexed as

Decision MakingGeneral PracticePhysician-Patient RelationsAttitude of Health PersonnelEuthanasiaFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedNetherlandsPalliative CarePatient ParticipationPatient PreferencePractice Guidelines as TopicPractice Patterns, Physicians'Procedural Sedation

Identifiers

PMID22759834
PMCPMC3515404
OpenAlexW2119279186

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.