Evidence map›Paper›PMID 22759654›Full record

ArticleBMC genomics2012

Evaluating our ability to predict the structural disruption of RNA by SNPs.

Justin Ritz, Joshua S Martin, Alain Laederach

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC genomics, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 37 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
37citing papers in PubMed
2.3field-weighted citation impact, top 11% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

37 citing papers in PubMed, 58 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Alternate RNA Structures.Cold Spring Harbor perspectives in biology · 2020
    Review
  12. Article
  13. A Functional riboSNitch in the 3' Untranslated Region ofThe Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2018
    Article
  14. Genetic variants in mRNA untranslated regions.Wiley interdisciplinary reviews. RNA · 2018
    Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Justin RitzDepartment of Biology, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, NC 27599, USA.
Joshua S Martin
Alain Laederach
University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill · US

Funding

Non-coding RNA structure change in Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary DiseaseR01HL111527 · NHLBI · UNIV OF NORTH CAROLINA CHAPEL HILL · PI Alain T Laederach, Kevin M Weeks · 2012 to 2026
$6.6M
Structural and functional consequences of disease SNPs on the transcriptomeR01GM101237 · NIGMS · UNIV OF NORTH CAROLINA CHAPEL HILL · PI LAEDERACH, ALAIN T · 2012 to 2020
$2.5M
Multi-Scale Dynamic Modeling of RNA Folding and AssemblyR00GM079953 · NIGMS · WADSWORTH CENTER · PI LAEDERACH, ALAIN T · 2008 to 2010
$969k
Identifying Disease-Associated Mutations That Alter RNA StructureR21MH087336 · NIMH · WADSWORTH CENTER · PI CURCIO, M JOAN · 2009 to 2010
$471k
NHLBI NIH HHS R01 HL111527NIGMS NIH HHS R00 GM079953NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM101237NIMH NIH HHS R21 MH087336
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The structure of RiboNucleic Acid (RNA) has the potential to be altered by a Single Nucleotide Polymorphism (SNP). Disease-associated SNPs mapping to non-coding regions of the genome that are transcribed into RiboNucleic Acid (RNA) can potentially affect cellular regulation (and cause disease) by altering the structure of the transcript. We performed a large-scale meta-analysis of Selective 2'-Hydroxyl Acylation analyzed by Primer Extension (SHAPE) data, which probes the structure of RNA. We found that several single point mutations exist that significantly disrupt RNA secondary structure in the five transcripts we analyzed. Thus, every RNA that is transcribed has the potential to be a "RiboSNitch;" where a SNP causes a large conformational change that alters regulatory function. Predicting the SNPs that will have the largest effect on RNA structure remains a contemporary computational challenge. We therefore benchmarked the most popular RNA structure prediction algorithms for their ability to identify mutations that maximally affect structure. We also evaluated metrics for rank ordering the extent of the structural change. Although no single algorithm/metric combination dramatically outperformed the others, small differences in AUC (Area Under the Curve) values reveal that certain approaches do provide better agreement with experiment. The experimental data we analyzed nonetheless show that multiple single point mutations exist in all RNA transcripts that significantly disrupt structure in agreement with the predictions.

Indexed as

AlgorithmsMutationNucleic Acid ConformationPolymorphism, Single NucleotideRNARNA

Identifiers

PMID22759654
PMCPMC3303743
OpenAlexW2132022105

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.