ArticleBMC bioinformatics2012
BioNLP Shared Task--The Bacteria Track.
Article in BMC bioinformatics, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
13 citing papers in PubMed.
- ECO-CollecTF: A Corpus of Annotated Evidence-Based Assertions in Biomedical Manuscripts.Frontiers in research metrics and analytics · 2021Article
- DTranNER: biomedical named entity recognition with deep learning-based label-label transition model.BMC bioinformatics · 2020Article
- Relation extraction between bacteria and biotopes from biomedical texts with attention mechanisms and domain-specific contextual representations.BMC bioinformatics · 2019Article
- Community challenges in biomedical text mining over 10 years: success, failure and the future.Briefings in bioinformatics · 2016Review
- Event-based text mining for biology and functional genomics.Briefings in functional genomics · 2015Review
- The contribution of co-reference resolution to supervised relation detection between bacteria and biotopes entities.BMC bioinformatics · 2015Article
- Detection and categorization of bacteria habitats using shallow linguistic analysis.BMC bioinformatics · 2015Article
- Overview of the gene regulation network and the bacteria biotope tasks in BioNLP'13 shared task.BMC bioinformatics · 2015Article
- An analysis on the entity annotations in biological corpora.F1000Research · 2014Review
- Biblio-MetReS for user-friendly mining of genes and biological processes in scientific documents.PeerJ · 2014Article
- Event extraction across multiple levels of biological organization.Bioinformatics (Oxford, England) · 2012Article
- Event extraction of bacteria biotopes: a knowledge-intensive NLP-based approach.BMC bioinformatics · 2012Article
- Biological event composition.BMC bioinformatics · 2012Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundWe present the BioNLP 2011 Shared Task Bacteria Track, the first Information Extraction challenge entirely dedicated to bacteria. It includes three tasks that cover different levels of biological knowledge. The Bacteria Gene Renaming supporting task is aimed at extracting gene renaming and gene name synonymy in PubMed abstracts. The Bacteria Gene Interaction is a gene/protein interaction extraction task from individual sentences. The interactions have been categorized into ten different sub-types, thus giving a detailed account of genetic regulations at the molecular level. Finally, the Bacteria Biotopes task focuses on the localization and environment of bacteria mentioned in textbook articles. We describe the process of creation for the three corpora, including document acquisition and manual annotation, as well as the metrics used to evaluate the participants' submissions.
resultsThree teams submitted to the Bacteria Gene Renaming task; the best team achieved an F-score of 87%. For the Bacteria Gene Interaction task, the only participant's score had reached a global F-score of 77%, although the system efficiency varies significantly from one sub-type to another. Three teams submitted to the Bacteria Biotopes task with very different approaches; the best team achieved an F-score of 45%. However, the detailed study of the participating systems efficiency reveals the strengths and weaknesses of each participating system.
conclusionsThe three tasks of the Bacteria Track offer participants a chance to address a wide range of issues in Information Extraction, including entity recognition, semantic typing and coreference resolution. We found common trends in the most efficient systems: the systematic use of syntactic dependencies and machine learning. Nevertheless, the originality of the Bacteria Biotopes task encouraged the use of interesting novel methods and techniques, such as term compositionality, scopes wider than the sentence.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.