ArticleBMC bioinformatics2012
Overview of the ID, EPI and REL tasks of BioNLP Shared Task 2011.
Article in BMC bioinformatics, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 37 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
37 citing papers in PubMed.
- Lifestyle factors in the biomedical literature: an ontology and comprehensive resources for named entity recognition.Bioinformatics (Oxford, England) · 2024Article
- RegulaTome: a corpus of typed, directed, and signed relations between biomedical entities in the scientific literature.Database : the journal of biological databases and curation · 2024Article
- The overview of the BioRED (Biomedical Relation Extraction Dataset) track at BioCreative VIII.Database : the journal of biological databases and curation · 2024Article
- Surveying biomedical relation extraction: a critical examination of current datasets and the proposal of a new resource.Briefings in bioinformatics · 2024Review
- Time Matters: Examine Temporal Effects on Biomedical Language Models.AMIA ... Annual Symposium proceedings. AMIA Symposium · 2024Article
- Streamlining event extraction with a simplified annotation framework.Frontiers in artificial intelligence · 2024Article
- A survey on clinical natural language processing in the United Kingdom from 2007 to 2022.NPJ digital medicine · 2022Review
- ECO-CollecTF: A Corpus of Annotated Evidence-Based Assertions in Biomedical Manuscripts.Frontiers in research metrics and analytics · 2021Article
- PGxCorpus, a manually annotated corpus for pharmacogenomics.Scientific data · 2020Article
- ProtFus: A Comprehensive Method Characterizing Protein-Protein Interactions of Fusion Proteins.PLoS computational biology · 2019Article
- Annotation and detection of drug effects in text for pharmacovigilance.Journal of cheminformatics · 2018Article
- Exploiting and assessing multi-source data for supervised biomedical named entity recognition.Bioinformatics (Oxford, England) · 2018Article
- A neural network multi-task learning approach to biomedical named entity recognition.BMC bioinformatics · 2017Article
- Collaborative relation annotation and quality analysis in Markyt environment.Database : the journal of biological databases and curation · 2017Article
- Cell line name recognition in support of the identification of synthetic lethality in cancer from text.Bioinformatics (Oxford, England) · 2016Article
- Community challenges in biomedical text mining over 10 years: success, failure and the future.Briefings in bioinformatics · 2016Review
- Mapping Phenotypic Information in Heterogeneous Textual Sources to a Domain-Specific Terminological Resource.PloS one · 2016Article
- Filtering large-scale event collections using a combination of supervised and unsupervised learning for event trigger classification.Journal of biomedical semantics · 2016Article
- Automated systems for the de-identification of longitudinal clinical narratives: Overview of 2014 i2b2/UTHealth shared task Track 1.Journal of biomedical informatics · 2015Review
- Event-based text mining for biology and functional genomics.Briefings in functional genomics · 2015Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
Abstract
We present the preparation, resources, results and analysis of three tasks of the BioNLP Shared Task 2011: the main tasks on Infectious Diseases (ID) and Epigenetics and Post-translational Modifications (EPI), and the supporting task on Entity Relations (REL). The two main tasks represent extensions of the event extraction model introduced in the BioNLP Shared Task 2009 (ST'09) to two new areas of biomedical scientific literature, each motivated by the needs of specific biocuration tasks. The ID task concerns the molecular mechanisms of infection, virulence and resistance, focusing in particular on the functions of a class of signaling systems that are ubiquitous in bacteria. The EPI task is dedicated to the extraction of statements regarding chemical modifications of DNA and proteins, with particular emphasis on changes relating to the epigenetic control of gene expression. By contrast to these two application-oriented main tasks, the REL task seeks to support extraction in general by separating challenges relating to part-of relations into a subproblem that can be addressed by independent systems. Seven groups participated in each of the two main tasks and four groups in the supporting task. The participating systems indicated advances in the capability of event extraction methods and demonstrated generalization in many aspects: from abstracts to full texts, from previously considered subdomains to new ones, and from the ST'09 extraction targets to other entities and events. The highest performance achieved in the supporting task REL, 58% F-score, is broadly comparable with levels reported for other relation extraction tasks. For the ID task, the highest-performing system achieved 56% F-score, comparable to the state-of-the-art performance at the established ST'09 task. In the EPI task, the best result was 53% F-score for the full set of extraction targets and 69% F-score for a reduced set of core extraction targets, approaching a level of performance sufficient for user-facing applications. In this study, we extend on previously reported results and perform further analyses of the outputs of the participating systems. We place specific emphasis on aspects of system performance relating to real-world applicability, considering alternate evaluation metrics and performing additional manual analysis of system outputs. We further demonstrate that the strengths of extraction systems can be combined to improve on the performance achieved by any system in isolation. The manually annotated corpora, supporting resources, and evaluation tools for all tasks are available from http://www.bionlp-st.org and the tasks continue as open challenges for all interested parties.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.