Evidence map›Paper›PMID 22759451›Full record

SynthesisImplementation science : IS2012

Measurement of a model of implementation for health care: toward a testable theory.

Joan M Cook, Casey O'Donnell, Stephanie Dinnen, James C Coyne, Josef I Ruzek, Paula P Schnurr

Abstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Implementation science : IS, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 34 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
34citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

34 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Observational
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Joan M CookDepartment of Psychiatry, Yale School of Medicine, 950 Campbell Avenue, NEPEC/182, West Haven, CT 06516, USA. Joan.Cook@yale.edu
Casey O'Donnell
Stephanie Dinnen
James C Coyne
Josef I Ruzek
Paula P Schnurr

Funding

IMPLEMENTATION RESEARCH INSTITUTE FOR MENTAL HEALTH SERVICES IRI-MHSR25MH080916 · NIMH · WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY · PI Byron James Powell · 2009 to 2026
$3.7M
Theory-Driven Mixed-Methods Evaluation of PTSD Treatment Implementation in VA ResRC1MH088454 · NIMH · YALE UNIVERSITY · PI COOK, JOAN M · 2009 to 2010
$918k
Dissemination of empirically-supported psychotherapiesK01MH070859 · NIMH · YALE UNIVERSITY · PI COOK, JOAN M · 2004 to 2008
$834k
NIMH NIH HHS K01 MH070859NIMH NIH HHS R25 MH080916NIMH NIH HHS RC1 MH088454
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundGreenhalgh et al. used a considerable evidence-base to develop a comprehensive model of implementation of innovations in healthcare organizations [1]. However, these authors did not fully operationalize their model, making it difficult to test formally. The present paper represents a first step in operationalizing Greenhalgh et al.'s model by providing background, rationale, working definitions, and measurement of key constructs.

methodsA systematic review of the literature was conducted for key words representing 53 separate sub-constructs from six of the model's broad constructs. Using an iterative process, we reviewed existing measures and utilized or adapted items. Where no one measure was deemed appropriate, we developed other items to measure the constructs through consensus.

resultsThe review and iterative process of team consensus identified three types of data that can been used to operationalize the constructs in the model: survey items, interview questions, and administrative data. Specific examples of each of these are reported.

conclusionDespite limitations, the mixed-methods approach to measurement using the survey, interview measure, and administrative data can facilitate research on implementation by providing investigators with a measurement tool that captures most of the constructs identified by the Greenhalgh model. These measures are currently being used to collect data concerning the implementation of two evidence-based psychotherapies disseminated nationally within Department of Veterans Affairs. Testing of psychometric properties and subsequent refinement should enhance the utility of the measures.

Indexed as

CommunicationHealth Services ResearchHumansInformation DisseminationInterviews as TopicLeadershipOrganizational InnovationSurveys and QuestionnairesTranslational Research, Biomedical

Identifiers

PMID22759451
PMCPMC3541168

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.