ReviewDrugs2012
Mannitol dry powder for inhalation: in patients with cystic fibrosis.
Review in Drugs, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed, 26 citations in OpenAlex.
- A physiologically-motivated model of cystic fibrosis liquid and solute transport dynamics across primary human nasal epithelia.Journal of pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics · 2019Article
- Hyper-osmolarity and calcium chelation: Effects on cystic fibrosis mucus.European journal of pharmacology · 2015Article
- Hypertonic saline releases the attached small intestinal cystic fibrosis mucus.Clinical and experimental pharmacology & physiology · 2015Article
- Sugar administration is an effective adjunctive therapy in the treatment of Pseudomonas aeruginosa pneumonia.American journal of physiology. Lung cellular and molecular physiology · 2013Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Mannitol dry powder for inhalation has been developed for the treatment of patients with cystic fibrosis. Two randomized, double-blind, multinational, 26-week, phase III trials (CF-301 and CF-302) examined the efficacy of inhaled dry powder mannitol in patients aged ≥ 6 years with cystic fibrosis who were receiving standard care (with a substantial proportion of patients receiving dornase alfa and antibacterials at baseline). Good compliance was seen in both studies. A sustained, significant (p<0.001) improvement in forced expiratory volume in 1 second (FEV(1)) [mean absolute change from baseline over 26 weeks; primary endpoint] was seen in patients with cystic fibrosis who received inhaled mannitol, compared with the control group, in the CF-301 trial, but not in the CF-302 trial (p=0.059). In both CF-301 and CF-302, the relative increase from baseline in percent predicted FEV(1) and the improvement from baseline in forced vital capacity were significantly greater in patients receiving inhaled mannitol than in the control group. In a pooled analysis of the CF-301 and CF-302 trials, the relative risk of a pulmonary exacerbation requiring intravenous antibacterials was significantly reduced by 29% for inhaled mannitol recipients versus the control group (relative risk 0.71; 95% CI 0.51, 0.98) [p=0.039]. Inhaled dry powder mannitol was generally well tolerated in adults with cystic fibrosis in the CF-301 and CF-302 studies, with most treatment-emergent adverse events being of mild to moderate severity.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.