ArticleOchsner journal2001
New therapies for type 1 diabetes mellitus.
Article in Ochsner journal, 2001. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 4 citations in OpenAlex.
- Recent publications by ochsner authors.Ochsner journal · 2002Article
- Recent publications by ochsner authors.Ochsner journal · 2001Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Five to ten percent of patients with diabetes mellitus in the United States suffer from type 1 diabetes: approximately 1.5 million people. Type 1 diabetes occurs when there is no insulin production from the beta cells of the pancreas and has often been associated with younger patients and thin body habitus. Type 2 diabetes, often linked with obesity, is associated with impaired insulin secretion and insulin resistance. Although the therapeutic goal is to maintain strict glycemic control in both types, management of type 1 diabetes is of a dissimilar nature due to differences in pathophysiologic mechanisms and patient characteristics. Newer therapies are aimed at achieving better glycemic control with minimal compromise to lifestyle. Some of these treatment measures, such as insulin pump therapy, have been available for years but were not used frequently until the mid-1990s. The increased use of intensive insulin therapy became more readily acceptable after the Diabetes Control and Complications Trial showed a decrease in microvascular complications with better glycemic control (hemoglobin A1C value of 7% or less). Insulin pumps, along with meal timings and, to a certain extent, regulation of the amount of food consumed, have allowed diabetes patients a more flexible lifestyle. Newer insulins are structured to mimick the pharmacokinetics of the endogenous basal (peakless sustained activity) and bolus (short fast-acting) insulins. Development of continuous, noninvasive, glucose sensing devices may reduce the need for capillary blood glucose testing (needle pricks) and make diabetes management more patient friendly and effective.
Identifiers
22754390PMC3385779W1926565814What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.