ArticleOchsner journal2001
Epidemiology, costs, consequences, and pathophysiology of type 2 diabetes: an american epidemic.
Article in Ochsner journal, 2001. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed, 10 citations in OpenAlex.
- Type 2 Diabetes Induces Mitochondrial Dysfunction in Zebrafish Skeletal Muscle Leading to Diabetic Myopathy via the miR-139-5p/NAMPT Pathway.International journal of molecular sciences · 2025Article
- Cutaneous Manifestation of Diabetes Mellitus in an Unsheltered Male Leading to Emergent Hospitalization.Cureus · 2022Article
- The relationship between polycystic ovary syndrome and insulin resistance from 1983 to 2022: A bibliometric analysis.Frontiers in public health · 2022Review
- Inhibition of Aurora-A improves insulin resistance by ameliorating islet inflammation and controlling interleukin-6 in a diabetic mouse model.Adipocyte · 2020Article
- Recent publications by ochsner authors.Ochsner journal · 2002Article
- Recent publications by ochsner authors.Ochsner journal · 2001Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The prevalence of diabetes in the United States increased by 33% from 4.9% in 1990 to 6.5% in 1998. Presently almost 16 million Americans have diabetes mellitus, and the prevalence of diabetes is doubling every 10-15 years. More than 90% of diabetic patients have type 2 diabetes; about one third of patients with type 2 diabetes are not yet diagnosed. Diabetes is the number one cause of adult blindness, end-stage renal disease, and nontraumatic amputations in the US and is associated with a marked increase in atherosclerotic disease.Diabetes is one of the most costly of medical conditions. In the US, 1 in every 7 health care dollars and 25% of the Medicare budget is spent on patients with diabetes. In 1997, total direct and indirect costs attributed to diabetes in the US were estimated at $98 billion. Substantial data suggest that glycemic control reduces morbidity and mortality as well as health care costs and improves quality of life and productivity.Relatively new diagnostic criteria for diabetes lower the threshold for diagnosis from 140 to 126 mg/dL. The pathophysiology of type 2 diabetes must be considered in the formulation of treatment strategies. The majority of patients with type 2 diabetes have both insulin resistance and an insulin secretory deficit. While medical nutrition therapy and carefully prescribed exercise remain the cornerstones of treatment, most patients will require pharmacologic agents to achieve treatment goals. In fact, studies indicate that most patients will require combinations of antidiabetic agents with complementary mechanisms of action. Fortunately, many new antidiabetic agents available during the past several years provide more options for patients with type 2 diabetes.
Identifiers
22754388PMC3385777W199106430What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.