Evidence map›Paper›PMID 22754229›Full record

ArticleIndian journal of human genetics2012

Utility of MLPA in mutation analysis and carrier detection for Duchenne muscular dystrophy.

Prashant K Verma, Ashwin Dalal, Balraj Mittal, Shubha R Phadke

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Indian journal of human genetics, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
0.5field-weighted citation impact, top 34% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 28 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Navigating Genetic Testing for India.Indian journal of pediatrics · 2026
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Mutation spectrum analysis ofF1000Research · 2022
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. MLPA Application in Clinical Diagnosis of DMD/BMD in Shanghai.Journal of clinical laboratory analysis · 2015
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Prashant K VermaDepartment of Medical Genetics, Sanjay Gandhi Postgraduate Institute of Medical Sciences, Lucknow, India.
Ashwin Dalal
Balraj Mittal
Shubha R Phadke
Centre for DNA Fingerprinting and Diagnostics · INSanjay Gandhi Post Graduate Institute of Medical Sciences · IN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

contextMultiplex ligation probe amplification (MLPA) is a new technique to identify deletions and duplications and can evaluate all 79 exons in dystrophin gene in patients with Duchenne muscular dystrophy (DMD). Being semi-quantitative, MLPA is also effective in detecting duplications and carrier testing of females; both of which cannot be done using multiplex PCR. It has found applications in diagnostics of many genetic disorders.

aimTo study the utility of MLPA in diagnosis and carrier detection for DMD. MATERIALS AND

methodsMutation analysis and carrier detection was done by multiplex PCR and MLPA and the results were compared. RESULTS AND

conclusionsWe present data showing utility of MLPA in identifying mutations in cases with DMD/BMD. In the present study using MLPA, we identified mutations in additional 5.6% cases of DMD in whom multiplex PCR was not able to detect intragenic deletions. In addition, MLPA also correctly confirmed carrier status of two obligate carriers and revealed carrier status in 6 of 8 mothers of sporadic cases.

Indexed as

carrier detectionDuchenne and Becker muscular dystrophiesDystrophinmultiplex ligation-dependent probe amplification

Identifiers

PMID22754229
PMCPMC3385188
OpenAlexW2100352489

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-SA
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.