ArticleJournal of bacteriology2012
Functional specificity of a protein-DNA complex mediated by two arginines bound to the minor groove.
Article in Journal of bacteriology, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 4 citations in OpenAlex.
- Molecular Modeling Applied to Nucleic Acid-Based Molecule Development.Biomolecules · 2018Review
- DNA recognition by Escherichia coli CbpA protein requires a conserved arginine-minor-groove interaction.Nucleic acids research · 2015Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
A bacteriophage Ø29 transcriptional regulator, protein p4, interacts with its DNA target by employing two mechanisms: by direct readout of the chemical signatures of only one DNA base and by inducing local modification on the topology of short A tracts (indirect readout). p4 binds as a dimer to targets consisting of imperfect inverted repeats. Here we used molecular dynamic simulation to define interactions of a cluster of 12 positively charged amino acids of p4 with DNA and biochemical assays with modified DNA targets and mutated proteins to quantify the contribution of residues in the nucleoprotein complex. Our results show the implication of Arg54, with non-base-specific interaction in the central A tract, in p4 binding affinity. Despite being chemically equivalent and in identical protein monomers, the two Arg54 residues differed in their interactions with DNA. We discuss an indirect-readout mechanism for p4-DNA recognition mediated by dissimilar interaction of arginines penetrating the minor groove and the inherent properties of the A tract. Our findings extend the current understanding of protein-DNA recognition and contribute to the relevance of the sequence-dependent conformational malleability of the DNA, shedding light on the role of arginines in binding affinity. Characterization of mutant p4R54A shows that the residue is required for the activity of the protein as a transcriptional regulator.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.