Evidence map›Paper›PMID 22753017›Full record

ReviewImmunologic research2013

For many but not for all: how the conformational flexibility of the peptide/MHCII complex shapes epitope selection.

Andrea Ferrante

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Immunologic research, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

Andrea FerranteInstitute of Arctic Biology, University of Alaska Fairbanks, Fairbanks, AK 99775-7000, USA. aferrante@alaska.edu

Funding

The Administrative CoreP20GM103395 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF ALASKA FAIRBANKS · PI BRIAN M BARNES · 2012 to 2026
$66.1M
Epitope selection by HLA-DRR01AI063016 · NIAID · VERSITI WISCONSIN, INC. · PI GORSKI, JACK A · 2005 to 2009
$1.5M
Permissive Specificity in Peptide Binding to HLA-DRR56AI098136 · NIAID · VERSITI WISCONSIN, INC. · PI GORSKI, JACK A · 2012 to 2012
$313k
NIAID NIH HHS R01 AI063016NIAID NIH HHS R56 AI098136NIGMS NIH HHS P20 GM103395NIGMS NIH HHS P20GM103395
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The adaptive immune response starts when CD4+ T cells recognize peptide antigens presented by class II molecules of the Major Histocompatibility Complex (MHCII). Two outstanding features of MHCII molecules are their polymorphism and the ability of each allele to bind a large panoply of peptides. The ability of each MHCII molecule to interact with a limited, though broad, range of amino acid sequences, or "permissive specificity" of binding, is the result of structural flexibility. This flexibility has been identified through biochemical and biophysical studies, and molecular dynamic simulations have modeled the conformational rearrangements that the peptide and the MHCII undergo during interaction. Moreover, there is evidence that the structural flexibility of the peptide/MHCII complex correlates with the activity of the "peptide-editing" molecule DM. In light of the impact that these recent findings have on our ability to predict MHCII epitopes, a review of the structural and thermodynamic determinants of peptide binding to MHCII is proposed.

Indexed as

AnimalsAntigen PresentationAntigensComputational BiologyHistocompatibility Antigens Class IIHumansImmunodominant EpitopesLymphocyte ActivationPeptide FragmentsProtein BindingProtein ConformationThermodynamicsAntigensHistocompatibility Antigens Class IIImmunodominant EpitopesPeptide Fragments

Identifiers

PMID22753017
PMCPMC4197051

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.