Evidence map›Paper›PMID 22752860›Full record

Trial reportClinical infectious diseases : an official publication of the Infectious Diseases Society of America2012

Reduced acquisition and overgrowth of vancomycin-resistant enterococci and Candida species in patients treated with fidaxomicin versus vancomycin for Clostridium difficile infection.

Michelle M Nerandzic, Kathleen Mullane, Mark A Miller, Farah Babakhani, Curtis J Donskey

Abstract readClinical Trial, Phase IIIMulticenter StudyRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Clinical infectious diseases : an official publication of the Infectious Diseases Society of America, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 72 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
72citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

72 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Guideline
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Treatment of first recurrence of Clostridium difficile infection: fidaxomicin versus vancomycin.Clinical infectious diseases : an official publication of the Infectious Diseases Society of America · 2012
    Trial
  5. Biomedicines · 2025
    Review
  6. Management ofEClinicalMedicine · 2025
    Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Navigating recurrentAntimicrobial stewardship & healthcare epidemiology : ASHE · 2025
    Article
  10. Clinical microbiology reviews · 2024
    Review
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Le infezioni in medicina · 2024
    Review
  14. Fungal and bacterial gut microbiota differ betweenMicrobiome research reports · 2024
    Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Journal of clinical medicine · 2023
    Review
  20. Article

12 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Michelle M NerandzicResearch Service, Cleveland Veterans Affairs Medical Center, Cleveland, Ohio 44106, USA.
Kathleen Mullane
Mark A Miller
Farah Babakhani
Curtis J Donskey

Funding

New Treatment for C. difficile-Associated DiarrheaR44AI063692 · NIAID · OPTIMER PHARMACEUTICALS, INC. · PI BABAKHANI, FARAH · 2007 to 2009
$3.0M
NIAID NIH HHS 5R44AI63692-4NIAID NIH HHS R44 AI063692
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Fidaxomicin causes less disruption of anaerobic microbiota during treatment of Clostridium difficile infection (CDI) than vancomycin and has activity against many vancomycin-resistant enterococci (VRE). In conjunction with a multicenter randomized trial of fidaxomicin versus vancomycin for CDI treatment, we tested the hypothesis that fidaxomicin promotes VRE and Candida species colonization less than vancomycin. Stool was cultured for VRE and Candida species before and after therapy. For patients with negative pretreatment cultures, the incidence of VRE and Candida species acquisition was compared. For those with preexisting VRE, the change in concentration during treatment was compared. The susceptibility of VRE isolates to fidaxomicin was assessed. Of 301 patients, 247 (82%) had negative VRE cultures and 252 (84%) had negative Candida species cultures before treatment. In comparison with vancomycin-treated patients, fidaxomicin-treated patients had reduced acquisition of VRE (7% vs 31%, respectively; P < .001) and Candida species (19% vs 29%, respectively; P = .03). For patients with preexisting VRE, the mean concentration decreased significantly in the fidaxomicin group (5.9 vs 3.8 log(10) VRE/g stool; P = .01) but not the vancomycin group (5.3 vs 4.2 log(10) VRE/g stool; P = .20). Most VRE isolates recovered after fidaxomicin treatment had elevated fidaxomicin minimum inhibitory concentrations (MICs; MIC(90), 256 µg/mL), and subpopulations of VRE with elevated fidaxomicin MICs were common before therapy. Fidaxomicin was less likely than vancomycin to promote acquisition of VRE and Candida species during CDI treatment. However, selection of preexisting subpopulations of VRE with elevated fidaxomicin MICs was common during fidaxomicin therapy.

Indexed as

AdultAgedAminoglycosidesAnti-Bacterial AgentsCanadaCandidaClostridioides difficileClostridium InfectionsDouble-Blind MethodDrug Resistance, BacterialEnterococcusFecesFemaleFidaxomicinHumansIncidenceAminoglycosidesAnti-Bacterial AgentsFidaxomicinVancomycin

Identifiers

PMID22752860
PMCPMC3388028

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.