Evidence map›Paper›PMID 22752662›Full record

ReviewMolecular neurobiology2012

Driving apoptosis-relevant proteins toward neural differentiation.

Susana Solá, Márcia M Aranha, Cecília M P Rodrigues

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Molecular neurobiology, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed
2.3field-weighted citation impact, top 12% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 25 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Susana SoláResearch Institute for Medicines and Pharmaceutical Sciences, University of Lisbon, Lisbon, Portugal. susana.sola@ff.ul.pt
Márcia M Aranha
Cecília M P Rodrigues
University of Lisbon · PT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Emerging evidence suggests that apoptosis regulators and executioners may control cell fate, without involving cell death per se. Indeed, several conserved elements of apoptosis are integral components of terminal differentiation, which must be restrictively activated to assure differentiation efficiency, and carefully regulated to avoid cell loss. A better understanding of the molecular mechanisms underlying key checkpoints responsible for neural differentiation, as an alternative to cell death will surely make stem cells more suitable for neuro-replacement therapies. In this review, we summarize recent studies on the mechanisms underlying the non-apoptotic function of p53, caspases, and Bcl-2 family members during neural differentiation. In addition, we discuss how apoptosis-regulatory proteins control the decision between differentiation, self-renewal, and cell death in neural stem cells, and how activity is restrained to prevent cell loss.

Indexed as

Cell DifferentiationAnimalsApoptosis Regulatory ProteinsCaspasesHumansNeuronsProto-Oncogene Proteins c-bcl-2Tumor Suppressor Protein p53Apoptosis Regulatory ProteinsCaspasesProto-Oncogene Proteins c-bcl-2Tumor Suppressor Protein p53

Identifiers

PMID22752662
OpenAlexW2034982030

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.