Evidence map›Paper›PMID 22752510›Full record

ArticleExperimental brain research2012

After-effects of consecutive sessions of transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) in a rat model of chronic inflammation.

Gabriela Laste, Wolnei Caumo, Lauren Naomi Spezia Adachi, Joanna Ripoll Rozisky, Isabel Cristina de Macedo, Paulo Ricardo Marques Filho, Wania Aparecida Partata, Felipe Fregni, Iraci L S Torres

2 registry-linked trialsAbstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Experimental brain research, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to 2 registered trials, which are not on this map. Cited by 31 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
31citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
3.2field-weighted citation impact, top 9% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT01747070 nacompletednot on this mapstarted 2014, after this paper: background citation

Effect of Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation and Electro Acupuncture in Pain, Functional Capability and Cortical Excitability in Patients With Osteoarthritis.

TypeinterventionalSponsorHospital de Clinicas de Porto AlegreRan2014 to 2016Enrolled60ConditionsOsteoarthritis, Knee, Chronic PainArmstDCS and EAC sham, tDCS sham and EAC sham, tDCS sham and EAC, tDCS and EAC
NCT01855958 nacompletednot on this map

Primary Motor Cortex Plasticity and the Bottom up Effect of Deep Intramuscular Needling Stimulation Therapy (DIMST)in Osteoarthritis Chronic Pain

TypeinterventionalSponsorHospital de Clinicas de Porto AlegreRan2012 to 2012Enrolled26ConditionsKnee Osteoarthritis, Chronic PainArmsDIMST, Placebo-sham
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

31 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 98 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Neuroprotection and Non-Invasive Brain Stimulation: Facts or Fiction?International journal of molecular sciences · 2022
    Review
  10. Non-invasive brain stimulation for osteoarthritis.Frontiers in aging neuroscience · 2022
    Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.

Gabriela LastePain Pharmacology and Neuromodulation, Animal Models Laboratory, Porto Alegre, Brazil. gabrielalaste@gmail.com
Wolnei Caumo
Lauren Naomi Spezia Adachi
Joanna Ripoll Rozisky
Isabel Cristina de Macedo
Paulo Ricardo Marques Filho
Wania Aparecida Partata
Felipe Fregni
Iraci L S Torres
Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul · BRHospital de Clínicas de Porto Alegre · BRBeth Israel Deaconess Medical Center · USInternational Neuromodulation Society · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) induces cortical excitability changes in animals and humans that can last beyond the duration of stimulation. Preliminary evidence suggests that tDCS may have an analgesic effect; however, the timing of these effects, especially when associated with consecutive sessions of stimulation in a controlled animal experiment setting, has yet to be fully explored. To evaluate the effects of tDCS in inflammatory chronic pain origin immediately and 24 h after the last treatment session, complete Freund's adjuvant (CFA) was injected (100 μl) in the right footpad to induce inflammation. On the 15th day after CFA injection, rats were divided into two groups: tDCS (n = 9) and sham (n = 9). The tDCS was applied for 8 days. The hot plate and Von Frey tests were applied immediately and 24 h after the last tDCS session. Eight 20-min sessions of 500 μA anodal tDCS resulted in antinociceptive effects as assessed by the hot plate test immediately (P = 0.04) and 24 h after the last tDCS session (P = 0.006), for the active tDCS group only. There was increased withdrawal latency in the Von Frey test at 24 h after the last session (P = 0.01). Our findings confirm the hypothesis that tDCS induces significant, long-lasting, neuroplastic effects and expands these findings to a chronic pain model of peripheral inflammation, thus supporting the exploration of this technique in conditions associated with chronic pain and peripheral inflammation, such as osteoarthritis.

Indexed as

Electric Stimulation TherapyTranscranial Magnetic StimulationAnimalsChronic DiseaseCytokinesDisease Models, AnimalElectrodesFreund's AdjuvantHyperalgesiaInflammationMalePain MeasurementPain ThresholdRatsRats, WistarReaction TimeCytokinesFreund's Adjuvant

Identifiers

PMID22752510
OpenAlexW2067438289

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.