Evidence map›Paper›PMID 22752384›Full record

Trial reportPsychopharmacology2012

Effects of mu opioid receptor antagonism on cognition in obese binge-eating individuals.

Samuel R Chamberlain, Karin Mogg, Brendan P Bradley, Annelize Koch, Chris M Dodds, Wenli X Tao, Kay Maltby, Bhopinder Sarai, Antonella Napolitano, Duncan B Richards and 2 more

Registry-linked trialAbstract readComparative StudyRandomized Controlled Trial
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Trial report in Psychopharmacology, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT01195792 (A 35-Day, Multi-Centre, Randomised, Parallel-Group, Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled Proof of Concept Study to Investigate the Effects of GSK1521498 on Body Weight and Composition, Eating Behaviour and Related Brain Function, in Obese Subjects With Over-Eating Behaviours.), which is not on this map. Cited by 18 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
18citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT01195792 phase2completednot on this map

A 35-Day, Multi-Centre, Randomised, Parallel-Group, Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled Proof of Concept Study to Investigate the Effects of GSK1521498 on Body Weight and Composition, Eating Behaviour and Related Brain Function, in Obese Subjects With Over-Eating Behaviours.

TypeinterventionalSponsorGlaxoSmithKlineRan2010 to 2011Enrolled60ConditionsObesityArmsGSK1521498, Placebo
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

18 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Trial
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Neuropharmacology of compulsive eating.Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences · 2018
    Review
  11. Review
  12. Pathological Overeating: Emerging Evidence for a Compulsivity Construct.Neuropsychopharmacology : official publication of the American College of Neuropsychopharmacology · 2017
    Review
  13. Review
  14. Review
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors.

Samuel R ChamberlainClinical Unit Cambridge, GlaxoSmithKline, Addenbrooke's Hospital, Cambridge CB0 0QQ, UK. srchamb@gmail.com
Karin Mogg
Brendan P Bradley
Annelize Koch
Chris M Dodds
Wenli X Tao
Kay Maltby
Bhopinder Sarai
Antonella Napolitano
Duncan B Richards
Edward T Bullmore
Pradeep J Nathan

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

rationaleTranslational research implicates the mu opioid neurochemical system in hedonic processing, but its role in dissociable high-level cognitive functions is not well understood. Binge-eating represents a useful model of 'behavioural addiction' for exploring this issue.

objectiveThe aim of this study was to objectively assess the cognitive effects of a mu opioid receptor antagonist in obese individuals with binge-eating symptoms.

methodsAdults with moderate to severe binge-eating and body mass index ≥30 kg/m² received 4 weeks of treatment with a mu opioid receptor antagonist (GSK1521498) 2 or 5 mg per day, or placebo, in a double-blind randomised parallel design. Neuropsychological assessment was undertaken at baseline and endpoint to quantify processing bias for food stimuli (visual dot probe with 500- and 2,000-ms stimulus presentations and food Stroop tasks) and other distinct cognitive functions (N-back working memory, sustained attention, and power of attention tasks).

resultsGSK1521498 5 mg/day significantly reduced attentional bias for food cues on the visual dot probe task versus placebo (p = 0.042), with no effects detected on other cognitive tasks (all p > 0.10). The effect on attentional bias was limited to the longer stimulus duration condition in the higher dose cohort alone.

conclusionsThese findings support a central role for mu opioid receptors in aspects of attentional processing of food cues but militate against the notion of major modulatory influences of mu opioid receptors in working memory and sustained attention. The findings have implications for novel therapeutic directions and suggest that the role of different opioid receptors in cognition merits further research.

Indexed as

AdolescentAdultAttentionBinge-Eating DisorderCognitionDose-Response Relationship, DrugDouble-Blind MethodFemaleHumansIndansMaleMiddle AgedNarcotic AntagonistsNeuropsychological TestsReceptors, Opioid, muSeverity of Illness IndexIndansN-((3,5-difluoro-3'-(1H-1,2,4-triazol-3-yl)-4-biphenylyl)methyl)-2,3-dihydro-1H-inden-2-amineNarcotic AntagonistsReceptors, Opioid, muTriazoles

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.