ArticleNaunyn-Schmiedeberg's archives of pharmacology2012
Opioid receptor characterisation of neuronally stimulated isolated human vas deferens.
Article in Naunyn-Schmiedeberg's archives of pharmacology, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed, 2 citations in OpenAlex.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Rodent vas deferens is routinely used as a native tissue preparation to assess opioid pharmacology of new compounds. The aim of this study was to investigate the effects of a selected number of opioid compounds in the human vas deferens. Stable contractions to electrical field stimulation (EFS) were inhibited by guanethidine (1 μM) and tetrodotoxin (TTX, 1 μΜ), confirming neuronally induced contractions. Contractile responses to EFS were inhibited by the selective δ-opioid agonists (DPDPE ([D-Pen2,5]enkephalin), PF-391459 (3-{4-[(R)-[(2S,5R)-4-benzyl-2,5-dimethylpiperazin-1-yl](3-hydroxyphenyl)methyl]phenyl}propanoic acid) and SNC-80 ((+)-4-[(αR)-α-((2 S,5R)-4-allyl-2,5-dimethyl-1-piperazinyl)-3-methoxybenzyl]-N,N-diethylbenzamide)) (tested from 1 ρM to 10 μM or maximum), and the μ-opioid agonists DAMGO ([D-Ala(2), NMe-Phe(4), Gly-ol(5)]-enkephalin), loperamide and SC-50484 (N-{2-[(N-acetyl-L-phenylalanyl)amino]-1,1-dimethylethyl}-L-tyrosinamide). There was no effect using the selective κ agonist U50488 (trans-3,4-dichloro-N-methyl-N-[2-(1-pyrrolidinyl)cyclohexyl]-benzeneacetamide) (tested from 1 ρM to 10 μM). The selective δ-opioid antagonist naltrindole (10 nM) surmountably antagonised the responses to DPDPE, but not to PF-3911459. Responses to DAMGO were completely abolished in the presence of the μ-opioid antagonist CTAP (3 μM), which only weakly antagonised responses to SC-50484. We conclude that under these conditions, δ and μ-opioid receptors, but not κ-opioid receptors, are functional in the neuronally stimulated longitudinal human vas deferens. Additionally, the human vas deferens preparation can be used as part of a drug discovery screening project to assess opioid potency, efficacy and selectivity at native human tissues, thus providing more confidence in translation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.