Evidence map›Paper›PMID 22752012›Full record

ReviewInternational urogynecology journal2013

Treatment of overactive bladder: what is on the horizon?

Alana M Murphy, Ryan M Krlin, Howard B Goldman

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in International urogynecology journal, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
2.8field-weighted citation impact, top 11% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 23 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Alana M MurphyGlickman Urological & Kidney Institute, Cleveland Clinic, Lerner College of Medicine, Cleveland, OH, USA. alana.m.murphy.md@gmail.com
Ryan M Krlin
Howard B Goldman
Cleveland Clinic Lerner College of Medicine · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

There is still a need to develop additional effective and well-tolerated therapies for the treatment of overactive bladder (OAB). The purpose of this review is to discuss alternative therapies for idiopathic OAB that employ a unique mechanism of action or offer a novel application of an existing therapy. We performed a comprehensive literature review to identify alternative therapies and potential future treatments for idiopathic OAB. The use of botulinumtoxin for idiopathic OAB is on the rise and FDA approval will likely be granted in the future. New innovations in neuromodulation hold the promise of less invasive and more patient-controlled therapies. A number of novel medications, such as β-adrenoreceptor agonists, or medications with alternative indications, such as phosphodiesterase inhibitors, have been identified as potential therapies for OAB. In addition, novel drug delivery systems, such as vaginal inserts, are also in development and may provide an attractive mechanism to deliver medications with proven efficacy. While conservative measures such as behavioral modification and pelvic floor exercises remain first-line therapy for OAB, anti-muscarinics are the mainstay of medical treatment. For patients with idiopathic OAB refractory to traditional first-line therapies, a number of promising new treatments are on the horizon.

Indexed as

Complementary TherapiesFemaleHumansUrinary Bladder, Overactive

Identifiers

PMID22752012
OpenAlexW2032770084

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.