Evidence map›Paper›PMID 22751546›Full record

ArticleAntimicrobial agents and chemotherapy2012

The presence of an FKS mutation rather than MIC is an independent risk factor for failure of echinocandin therapy among patients with invasive candidiasis due to Candida glabrata.

Ryan K Shields, M Hong Nguyen, Ellen G Press, Andrea L Kwa, Shaoji Cheng, Chen Du, Cornelius J Clancy

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Antimicrobial agents and chemotherapy, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 99 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
99citing papers in PubMed
7.7field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

99 citing papers in PubMed, 170 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Emergence and Comparative Analysis ofJournal of fungi (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Biochemical and Physiological Profiles ofLife (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Fighting Emerging Caspofungin-ResistantAntibiotics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024
    Article
  11. Antimicrobial agents and chemotherapy · 2024
    Article
  12. Review
  13. Development of Echinocandin Resistance inJournal of fungi (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023
    Article
  14. Fungal Drug Response and Antimicrobial Resistance.Journal of fungi (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023
    Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Clinical utility of antifungal susceptibility testing.JAC-antimicrobial resistance · 2022
    Review
  19. Article
  20. Raman Spectroscopy of OralInternational journal of molecular sciences · 2022
    Article

39 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Ryan K ShieldsDepartment of Medicine, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, USA.
M Hong Nguyen
Ellen G Press
Andrea L Kwa
Shaoji Cheng
Chen Du
Cornelius J Clancy
University of Pittsburgh · USSingapore General Hospital · SG

Funding

University of Pittsburgh Clinical and Translational Science InstitutionKL2RR024154 · NCRR · UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH AT PITTSBURGH · PI REIS, STEVEN E · 2006 to 2011
$22.2M
University of Pittsburgh Clinical and Translational Science InstitutionKL2TR000146 · NCATS · UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH AT PITTSBURGH · PI REIS, STEVEN E · 2012 to 2015
$8.7M
NCATS NIH HHS KL2 TR000146NCRR NIH HHS KL2 RR024154PHS HHS KL2TR000146
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Echinocandins are frontline agents against invasive candidiasis (IC), but predictors for echinocandin therapeutic failure have not been well defined. Mutations in Candida FKS genes, which encode the enzyme targeted by echinocandins, result in elevated MICs and have been linked to therapeutic failures. In this study, echinocandin MICs by broth microdilution and FKS1 and FKS2 mutations among C. glabrata isolates recovered from patients with IC at our center were correlated retrospectively with echinocandin therapeutic responses. Thirty-five patients with candidemia and 4 with intra-abdominal abscesses were included, 92% (36/39) of whom received caspofungin. Twenty-six percent (10) and 74% (29) failed and responded to echinocandin therapy, respectively. Caspofungin, anidulafungin, and micafungin MICs ranged from 0.5 to 8, 0.03 to 1, and 0.015 to 0.5 μg/ml, respectively. FKS mutations were detected in 18% (7/39) of C. glabrata isolates (FKS1, n = 2; FKS2, n = 5). Median caspofungin and anidulafungin MICs were higher for patients who failed therapy (P = 0.04 and 0.006, respectively). By receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analyses, MIC cutoffs that best predicted failure were >0.5 (caspofungin), >0.06 (anidulafungin), and >0.03 μg/ml (micafungin), for which sensitivity/specificity were 60%/86%, 50%/97%, and 40%/90%, respectively. Sensitivity/specificity of an FKS mutation in predicting failure were 60%/97%. By univariate analysis, recent gastrointestinal surgery, prior echinocandin exposure, anidulafungin MIC of >0.06 μg/ml, caspofungin MIC of >0.5 μg/ml, and an FKS mutation were significantly associated with failure. The presence of an FKS mutation was the only independent risk factor by multivariate analysis (P = 0.002). In conclusion, detection of C. glabrata FKS mutations was superior to MICs in predicting echinocandin therapeutic responses among patients with IC.

Indexed as

Abdominal AbscessAdultAgedAged, 80 and overAntifungal AgentsCandida glabrataCandidemiaCandidiasis, InvasiveEchinocandinsFemaleFungal ProteinsGlucosyltransferasesHumansMaleMicrobial Sensitivity TestsMiddle AgedAntifungal AgentsEchinocandinsFungal ProteinsGlucosyltransferases

Identifiers

PMID22751546
PMCPMC3421882
OpenAlexW2165481914

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.