Evidence map›Paper›PMID 22751436›Full record

ArticleCell cycle (Georgetown, Tex.)2012

CDK4/6 inhibition antagonizes the cytotoxic response to anthracycline therapy.

A Kathleen McClendon, Jeffry L Dean, Dayana B Rivadeneira, Justine E Yu, Christopher A Reed, Erhe Gao, John L Farber, Thomas Force, Walter J Koch, Erik S Knudsen

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Cell cycle (Georgetown, Tex.), 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 95 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
95citing papers in PubMed
10.3field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

95 citing papers in PubMed, 169 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Targeting CDK4 and CDK6 in cancer.Nature reviews. Cancer · 2022
    Review
  16. Review
  17. Review
  18. Review
  19. Review
  20. Article

35 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.

A Kathleen McClendonDepartment of Cancer Biology at Kimmel Cancer Center, Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, PA, USA.
Jeffry L Dean
Dayana B Rivadeneira
Justine E Yu
Christopher A Reed
Erhe Gao
John L Farber
Thomas Force
Walter J Koch
Erik S Knudsen
Philadelphia University · USThomas Jefferson University · USCenter for Translational Molecular Medicine · NLTemple University · US

Funding

Role of the RB tumor suppressor in liver tumorigenesisR01CA127387 · NCI · UT SOUTHWESTERN MEDICAL CENTER · PI KNUDSEN, ERIK · 2008 to 2019
$3.6M
Action of RB Pathway in Breast Cancer TherapyR01CA129134 · NCI · UT SOUTHWESTERN MEDICAL CENTER · PI KNUDSEN, ERIK · 2010 to 2014
$1.7M
NCI NIH HHS 5R01CA127387NCI NIH HHS R01 CA127387NCI NIH HHS R01 CA129134
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC) is an aggressive disease that lacks established markers to direct therapeutic intervention. Thus, these tumors are routinely treated with cytotoxic chemotherapies (e.g., anthracyclines), which can cause severe side effects that impact quality of life. Recent studies indicate that the retinoblastoma tumor suppressor (RB) pathway is an important determinant in TNBC disease progression and therapeutic outcome. Furthermore, new therapeutic agents have been developed that specifically target the RB pathway, potentially positioning RB as a novel molecular marker for directing treatment. The current study evaluates the efficacy of pharmacological CDK4/6 inhibition in combination with the widely used genotoxic agent doxorubicin in the treatment of TNBC. Results demonstrate that in RB-proficient TNBC models, pharmacological CDK4/6 inhibition yields a cooperative cytostatic effect with doxorubicin but ultimately protects RB-proficient cells from doxorubicin-mediated cytotoxicity. In contrast, CDK4/6 inhibition does not alter the therapeutic response of RB-deficient TNBC cells to doxorubicin-mediated cytotoxicity, indicating that the effects of doxorubicin are indeed dependent on RB-mediated cell cycle control. Finally, the ability of CDK4/6 inhibition to protect TNBC cells from doxorubicin-mediated cytotoxicity resulted in recurrent populations of cells specifically in RB-proficient cell models, indicating that CDK4/6 inhibition can preserve cell viability in the presence of genotoxic agents. Combined, these studies suggest that while targeting the RB pathway represents a novel means of treatment in aggressive diseases such as TNBC, there should be a certain degree of caution when considering combination regimens of CDK4/6 inhibitors with genotoxic compounds that rely heavily on cell proliferation for their cytotoxic effects.

Indexed as

AnimalsAntibiotics, AntineoplasticBreast NeoplasmsCell Cycle CheckpointsCell Line, TumorCell SurvivalCyclin-Dependent Kinase 4Cyclin-Dependent Kinase 6DoxorubicinFemaleHumansMiceMice, NudePiperazinesProtein Kinase InhibitorsPyridinesAntibiotics, AntineoplasticCyclin-Dependent Kinase 4Cyclin-Dependent Kinase 6DoxorubicinpalbociclibPiperazinesProtein Kinase InhibitorsPyridinesRetinoblastoma Protein

Identifiers

PMID22751436
PMCPMC3409014
OpenAlexW2059195185

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.