Evidence map›Paper›PMID 22750955›Full record

ReviewNature reviews. Urology2012

Patented prostate cancer biomarkers.

Lisa Murphy, R William Watson

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Nature reviews. Urology, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Focal Ablation of Prostate Cancer.Reviews in urology · 2018
    Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Lisa MurphyUniversity College Dublin School of Medicine and Medical Science, Conway Institute of Biomolecular and Biomedical Research, University College Dublin, Belfield, Dublin 4, Ireland.
R William WatsonUniversity College Dublin School of Medicine and Medical Science, Conway Institute of Biomolecular and Biomedical Research, University College Dublin, Belfield, Dublin 4, Ireland.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Prostate cancer is the most frequently diagnosed cancer in men. However, current diagnostic techniques (including serum PSA level measurement) lack sufficient specificity and sensitivity to determine the aggressiveness of the disease and to identify appropriate treatment. Additional reliable biomarkers are needed that can facilitate early diagnosis of prostate cancer, determine the patient's prognosis and predict responses to a given therapeutic intervention. To achieve clinical utility, biomarkers require the potential for commercialization, and such an investment is generally only made if a financial return is promised. Patenting is one way to protect the intellectual property surrounding such biomarkers and several patented biomarkers are being developed, although few have been validated in large-scale clinical trials.

Indexed as

Patents as TopicBiomarkers, TumorHumansKallikreinsMalePrognosisProstate-Specific AntigenProstatic NeoplasmsSensitivity and SpecificityBiomarkers, TumorKallikreinsKLK3 protein, humanProstate-Specific Antigen

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.